On Two Unsolved Problems Concerning Matching Covered Graphs
Cláudio L. Lucchesi, Marcelo H. de Carvalho, Nishad Kothari, U. S. R. Murty
Source abstract
A cut of a matching covered graph is a separating cut if both its -contractions and are also matching covered. A brick is solid if it is free of nontrivial separating cuts. Three of us (Carvalho, Lucchesi, and Murty [ J. Combin. Theory Ser. B, 92 (2004), pp. 319--324]) showed that the perfect matching polytope of a brick may be described without recourse to odd set constraints if and only if it is solid, and we proved (Carvalho, Lucchesi, and Murty [ Discrete Math., 306 (2006), pp. 2383--2410]) that the only simple planar solid bricks are the odd wheels. The problem of characterizing nonplanar solid bricks remains unsolved. A bisubdivision of a graph is a graph obtained from by replacing each of its edges by paths of odd length. A matching covered graph is a conformal minor of a matching covered graph if there exists a bisubdivision of which is a subgraph of such that has a perfect matching. For a fixed matching covered graph , a matching covered graph is -based if is a conformal minor of and, otherwise, is -free. A basic result due to Lovász [ Combinatorica, 3 (1983), pp. 105--117] states that every nonbipartite matching covered graph is either -based or is -based or both, where is the triangular prism. Two of us (Kothari and Murty [ J. Graph Theory, 82 (2016), pp. 5--32]) showed that, for any cubic brick , a matching covered graph is -free if and only if each of its bricks is -free. We also found characterizations of planar bricks which are -free and those which are -free. Each of these problems remains unsolved in the nonplanar case. In this paper we show that the seemingly unrelated problems of characterizing nonplanar solid bricks on the one hand, and on the other of characterizing nonplanar -free bricks, are essentially the same. We do this by establishing that a simple nonplanar brick, other than the Petersen graph, is solid if and only if it is -free. In order to prove this, we first show that any nonsolid brick has one of the four graphs , the bicorn, the tricorn, and the Petersen graph as a conformal minor. Then, using a powerful theorem due to Norine and Thomas [ J. Combin. Theory Ser. B, 97 (2007), pp. 769--817], we show that the bicorn, the tricorn, and the Petersen graph are dead-ends in the sense that any simple nonplanar nonsolid brick which contains any one of these three graphs as a proper conformal minor also contains as a conformal minor.
Evidence graph
No public relationships recorded yet.
Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.