Indexed metadata

On Two Unsolved Problems Concerning Matching Covered Graphs

Cláudio L. Lucchesi, Marcelo H. de Carvalho, Nishad Kothari, U. S. R. Murty

Source record

Source: Crossref

Published: Jan 1, 2018

DOI: 10.1137/17m1138704

Open original source ↗

Source abstract

A cut C:=∂(X)C:=\partial (X) of a matching covered graph GG is a separating cut if both its CC-contractions G/XG/X and G/X‾G/\overline{X} are also matching covered. A brick is solid if it is free of nontrivial separating cuts. Three of us (Carvalho, Lucchesi, and Murty [ J. Combin. Theory Ser. B, 92 (2004), pp. 319--324]) showed that the perfect matching polytope of a brick may be described without recourse to odd set constraints if and only if it is solid, and we proved (Carvalho, Lucchesi, and Murty [ Discrete Math., 306 (2006), pp. 2383--2410]) that the only simple planar solid bricks are the odd wheels. The problem of characterizing nonplanar solid bricks remains unsolved. A bisubdivision of a graph JJ is a graph obtained from JJ by replacing each of its edges by paths of odd length. A matching covered graph JJ is a conformal minor of a matching covered graph GG if there exists a bisubdivision HH of JJ which is a subgraph of GG such that G−V(H)G-V(H) has a perfect matching. For a fixed matching covered graph JJ, a matching covered graph GG is JJ-based if JJ is a conformal minor of GG and, otherwise, GG is JJ-free. A basic result due to Lovász [ Combinatorica, 3 (1983), pp. 105--117] states that every nonbipartite matching covered graph is either K4K_4-based or is C6‾\overline{C_6}-based or both, where C6‾\overline{C_6} is the triangular prism. Two of us (Kothari and Murty [ J. Graph Theory, 82 (2016), pp. 5--32]) showed that, for any cubic brick JJ, a matching covered graph GG is JJ-free if and only if each of its bricks is JJ-free. We also found characterizations of planar bricks which are K4K_4-free and those which are C6‾\overline{C_6}-free. Each of these problems remains unsolved in the nonplanar case. In this paper we show that the seemingly unrelated problems of characterizing nonplanar solid bricks on the one hand, and on the other of characterizing nonplanar C6‾\overline{C_6}-free bricks, are essentially the same. We do this by establishing that a simple nonplanar brick, other than the Petersen graph, is solid if and only if it is C6‾\overline{C_6}-free. In order to prove this, we first show that any nonsolid brick has one of the four graphs C6‾\overline{C_6}, the bicorn, the tricorn, and the Petersen graph as a conformal minor. Then, using a powerful theorem due to Norine and Thomas [ J. Combin. Theory Ser. B, 97 (2007), pp. 769--817], we show that the bicorn, the tricorn, and the Petersen graph are dead-ends in the sense that any simple nonplanar nonsolid brick which contains any one of these three graphs as a proper conformal minor also contains C6‾\overline{C_6} as a conformal minor.

Evidence graph

No public relationships recorded yet.

Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.

On Two Unsolved Problems Concerning Matching Covered Graphs — Mathematical Frontier Network