Indexed metadata

The counts of parity-odd vs even late-growing permutations in the group S2p−1\mathbb{S}_{2p-1} differ by (−1)p(-1)^p

Kian C. Shah, Arthemy V. Kiselev

Source record

Source: arXiv

Published: Oct 26, 2026

arXiv: 2610.35779

Open original source ↗

Source abstract

A permutation σ∈Snσ\in\mathbb{S}_n of objects {1,…,n}\{1,\ldots,n\} is called \emph{late-growing} if its partial sums never exceed the respective partial sums of the `average' permutation (with the arithmetic mean n−1⋅∑i=1ni=(n+1)/2n^{-1}\cdot\sum_{i=1}^n i = (n+1)/2 of 1,…,n1,\ldots,n on average at each entry σ(i)σ(i)): ∑i=1kσ(i)⩽k⋅(n+1)/2\sum_{i=1}^k σ(i) \leqslant k\cdot (n+1)/2 for all positive k⩽nk\leqslant n. We prove that for n=2p−1n=2p-1 odd, the set Φp⊆S2p−1Φ_p\subseteq \mathbb{S}_{2p-1} of late-growing permutations is partitioned into parity-even vs odd elements, Φp=Φp+⊔Φp−Φ_p = Φ_p^{+} \sqcup Φ_p^{-}, in an almost symmetric way: ∣Φp+∣−∣Φp−∣=(−1)p+1| Φ_p^{+} | - | Φ_p^{-} | = (-1)^{p+1}. The proof is constructive: by viewing the permutations σ∈Φpσ\inΦ_p as constrained walks on the integral lattice Z\mathbb{Z}, we describe two filters that pair all but one element in Φp+Φ_p^{+} versus Φp−Φ_p^{-}; the remaining walk σ∗σ^* with monotonically growing step amplitudes determines the dominant parity subset.

Evidence graph

No public relationships recorded yet.

Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.