Indexed metadata

The Fibonacci numbers are not an additive uniqueness set for multiplicative functions

Poo-Sung Park

Source record

Source: arXiv

Published: Sep 8, 2026

arXiv: 2609.08137

Open original source ↗

Source abstract

Let (Fn)n0(F_n)_{n\geq 0} be the Fibonacci sequence. We show that a multiplicative function ff satisfying f(Fn+Fm)=f(Fn)+f(Fm)(n,m1) f(F_n+F_m)=f(F_n)+f(F_m)\qquad(n,m\geq 1) need not be the identity function, even when ff takes positive integer values. This answers negatively a question posed by Spiro in 1992. The smallest example presented here is obtained from F31=5572417F_{31}=557\cdot 2417. We prove the required divisibility equivalence, formulate an abstract prime-signature construction, and give a practical criterion producing further examples. We also describe the AI-assisted search that led to the construction and provide a reproducible certificate checker.

Evidence graph

No public relationships recorded yet.

Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.

The Fibonacci numbers are not an additive uniqueness set for multiplicative functions — Mathematical Frontier Network