Indexed metadata

The brittle-ductile transition in silicon. II. Interpretation

Peter Bernhard Hirsch, S. G. Roberts, J. Samuels

Source record

Source: Crossref

Published: Jan 9, 1989

DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1989.0002

Open original source ↗

Source abstract

Abstract A dynamic crack tip shielding model has been developed to describe the brittle-ductile transition (BDT) of precracked crystals in constant strain-rate tests. Dislocations are emitted from a discrete number of sources at or near the crack tip. At the BDT the dislocations are emitted and move sufficiently rapidly to shield the most vulnerable parts of the crack, furthest away from the sources, such that the local stress intensity factor remains below KIc for values of the applied stress intensity factor K above KIc. Computer simulations of the dynamics of dislocation generation from the crack tip sources, assuming mode III loading, suggest that a sharp transition as observed in silicon is predicted only if generation starts at K ≡ K0 ≈ KIc, but then continues at K ≡ KN ≪ KIc. Dislocation etch pit studies reported by Samuels & Roberts (Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 421, 1─23 (1989)) (hereafter called I) confirm that generation begins at K0 ≈ KIc. It is suggested that K0 corresponds to the value of K at which a crack tip source is nucleated by movement of an existing dislocation in the crystal to the crack tip. The model accounts quantitatively for the strain-rate dependence of the transition temperature Tc reported in I, and predicts a dependence of Tc on dislocation density, in qualitative agreement with (unpublished) experiments. Calcluations of the strees field around the crack tip of a semicircular precrack, suggest that the ends of the half loops emitted by crack tip sources undergo multiple cross slip to follow the crack profile. The predicted dislocation configurations agree with etch pit observations reported in I.

Evidence graph

No public relationships recorded yet.

Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.