Indexed metadata

Summing the reciprocal of the polynomial appearing in Fermat's Last Theorem

Ariel Edery

Source record

Source: arXiv

Published: Sep 2, 2026

arXiv: 2609.02112

Open original source ↗

Source abstract

Consider the polynomial f=xN+yNzNf=x^N+y^N-z^N where x,yx,\,y and zz are positive integers and N3N \ge 3 is an integer. By Fermat's Last Theorem, ff is never zero so that its reciprocal, 1/f1/f, has no singularities. We therefore study the finite sum of the reciprocal: S(m,N)=x=1my=1mz=1m1fS(m,N)=\sum_{x=1}^m\sum_{y=1}^m\sum_{z=1}^{m}\frac{1}{f}. The terms 1/f1/f can be positive, negative and their magnitude is less than unity. A key observation is that S(m,N)S(m,N) can be split into two convenient parts: a dominant contribution D(m,N)D(m,N) that has a simple analytical expression and a remainder R(m,N)R(m,N) which is more complicated but negligible compared to D(m,N)D(m,N). Therefore, S(m,N)S(m,N) is almost identical to D(m,N)D(m,N). The analytical expression for D(m,N)D(m,N) is (2m1)Hm(N)(2\,m-1)\,H_m^{(N)} where Hm(N)=x=1m1xNH_m^{(N)}=\sum_{x=1}^m\frac{1}{x^N} approaches quickly the Riemann zeta function ζ(N)ζ(N) as mm increases. Therefore, the original sum S(m,N)S(m,N) has a simple expression: it is basically linear in mm with slope equal to 2ζ(N)2\,ζ(N). Its linear behavior is not an asymptotic result; plots of S(m,N)S(m,N) vs. mm for different NN show a straight line starting at m=1m=1. S(m,N)S(m,N) deviates slightly from a straight line over a small interval 8m128\le m\le 12 for the case N=3N=3. This slight deviation is due to Fermat near misses where x3+y3z3=±1x^3+y^3-z^3=\pm 1 (for zxz\ne x and zyz\ne y); these create a jump in the remainder R(m,3)R(m,3) at m=9m=9. We make a numerical and analytical study of the remainder R(m,N)R(m,N). From the numerical analysis, R(m,N)R(m,N) converges for N4N\ge 4 but it was harder to tell whether N=3N=3 converged. An analytical study based on a comparison of R(m,N)R(m,N) to its Cauchy principal value integral, shows that R(m,3)R(m,3) likely diverges logarithmically. It also shows that R(m,N)R(m,N) converges for N4N\ge 4 in agreement with the numerical analysis. We discuss in the conclusion some interesting questions for future investigation.

Evidence graph

No public relationships recorded yet.

Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.