Indexed metadata

Methods for investigating parameter redundancy

O. Gimenez, A. Villefont, E. A. Catchpole, R, Choquet, B. J. T. Morgan

Source record

Source: Crossref

Published: Jun 1, 2004

DOI: 10.32800/abc.2004.27.0561

Open original source ↗

Source abstract

The quantitative study of marked individuals relies mainly on the use of meaningful biological models. Classical inference is then conducted based on the model likelihood, parameterized by parameters such as survival, recovery, transition and recapture probabilities. In classical statistics, we seek parameter estimates by maximising the likelihood. However, models are often overparameterized and, as a consequence, some parameters cannot be estimated separately. Identifying how many and which (functions of) parameters are estimable is thus crucial not only for proper model selection based upon likelihood ratio tests or information criteria but also for the interpretation of the estimates obtained. In this paper, we provide the reader with a description of the tools available to check for parameter redundancy. We aim to assist people in choosing the most appropriate method to solve their own specific problems.

Evidence graph

No public relationships recorded yet.

Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.

Methods for investigating parameter redundancy — Mathematical Frontier Network