Period of the power generator and small values of Carmichael’s function
John Friedlander, Carl Pomerance, Igor Shparlinski
Source record
Source: Crossref
Published: Jul 13, 2000
DOI: 10.1090/s0025-5718-00-01282-5
Open original source ↗Source abstract
Consider the pseudorandom number generator u n ≡ u n − 1 e ( mod m ) , 0 ≤ u n ≤ m − 1 , n = 1 , 2 , … , where we are given the modulus m m , the initial value u 0 = ϑ u_0=\vartheta and the exponent e e . One case of particular interest is when the modulus m m is of the form p l pl , where p , l p,l are different primes of the same magnitude. It is known from work of the first and third authors that for moduli m = p l m=pl , if the period of the sequence ( u n ) (u_n) exceeds m 3 / 4 + ε m^{3/4+\varepsilon } , then the sequence is uniformly distributed. We show rigorously that for almost all choices of p , l p,l it is the case that for almost all choices of ϑ , e \vartheta ,e , the period of the power generator exceeds ( p l ) 1 − ε (pl)^{1-\varepsilon } . And so, in this case, the power generator is uniformly distributed. We also give some other cryptographic applications, namely, to ruling-out the cycling attack on the RSA cryptosystem and to so-called time-release crypto. The principal tool is an estimate related to the Carmichael function λ ( m ) \lambda (m) , the size of the largest cyclic subgroup of the multiplicative group of residues modulo m m . In particular, we show that for any Δ ≥ ( log log N ) 3 \Delta \ge (\log \log N)^3 , we have λ ( m ) ≥ N exp ( − Δ ) \lambda (m)\ge N\exp (-\Delta ) for all integers m m with 1 ≤ m ≤ N 1\le m\le N , apart from at most N exp ( − 0.69 ( Δ log Δ ) 1 / 3 ) N\exp \left (-0.69\left (\Delta \log \Delta \right )^{1/3}\right ) exceptions.
Evidence graph
No public relationships recorded yet.
Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.