A Manager-Assisted Hybrid Decision Support System Using Advanced AI Models for Demand Forecasting and Inventory Risk Management in Fashion Manufacturing and Distribution
Jea-Kwon Lee, Md Ariful Islam Mozumder, Dae-Young Kim, Hee-Cheol Kim
Source record
Source: Crossref
Published: Sep 8, 2026
DOI: 10.20944/preprints202609.0669.v1
Open original source ↗Source abstract
Fashion enterprises face demand uncertainty from seasonality, short product life cycles, and dense color-size variation: excessive ordering enlarges aged-inventory risk, whereas insufficient ordering causes stockouts. This study develops and validates a manager-assisted hybrid decision support system (DSS) integrating demand forecasting, reorder-candidate identification, aged-inventory risk detection, and ranking-based prioritization. Operational data from a Korean fashion enterprise (4,130,603 sales and 5,065,027 order records) were reconstructed into a style-level monthly panel of 263,260 observations and split chronologically into training (2012–2014), validation (2015), and test (2016) periods to prevent leakage. Three baselines and nine data-driven models, Random Forest, Histogram Gradient Boosting, LightGBM, a two-stage Hurdle LightGBM, LSTM, Transformer, TimeMixer, TimeXer, and CrossLinear, were benchmarked, their outputs then combined with current-month sales signals and an inventory-comparison rule inside the DSS. On the 2016 test data, the DSS attained a Weighted Absolute Percentage Error of 0.6477, reorder F1-score of 0.7983, Hit@50 of 47.04%, and NDCG@50 of 75.12%, a balance no single model achieved. A policy simulation indicated that DSS-guided ordering could cut inbound order quantity by 25.9% and long-term inventory risk by 23.0%, at the cost of a 39.5% rise in shortage quantity. Forecasting accuracy alone is therefore insufficient for deploying artificial intelligence in inventory decisions.
Evidence graph
No public relationships recorded yet.
Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.