Indexed metadata

Distinguishing Maps

Thomas W. Tucker

Source record

Source: Crossref

Published: Feb 28, 2011

DOI: 10.37236/537

Open original source ↗

Source abstract

The distinguishing number of a group AA acting faithfully on a set XX, denoted D(A,X)D(A,X), is the least number of colors needed to color the elements of XX so that no nonidentity element of AA preserves the coloring. Given a map MM (an embedding of a graph in a closed surface) with vertex set VV and without loops or multiples edges, let D(M)=D(Aut(M),V)D(M)=D({\rm Aut}(M),V), where Aut(M){\rm Aut(M)} is the automorphism group of MM; if MM is orientable, define D+(M)D^+(M) similarly, using only orientation-preserving automorphisms. It is immediate that D(M)≤4D(M)\leq 4 and D+(M)≤3D^+(M)\leq 3. We use Russell and Sundaram's Motion Lemma to show that there are only finitely many maps MM with D(M)>2D(M)>2. We show that if a group AA of automorphisms of a graph GG fixes no edges, then D(A,V)=2D(A,V)=2, with five exceptions. That result is used to find the four maps with D+(M)=3D^+(M)=3. We also consider the distinguishing chromatic number χD(M)\chi_D(M), where adjacent vertices get different colors. We show χD(M)≤χ(M)+3\chi_D(M)\leq \chi(M)+3 with equality in only finitely many cases, where χ(M)\chi(M) is the chromatic number of the graph underlying MM. We also show that χD(M)≤6\chi_D(M)\leq 6 for planar maps, answering a question of Collins and Trenk. Finally, we discuss the implications for general group actions and give numerous problems for further study.

Evidence graph

No public relationships recorded yet.

Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.