COMAP Pathfinder – Season 2 results
D. A. Dunne, K. A. Cleary, J. G. S. Lunde, D. T. Chung, P. C. Breysse, N.-O. Stutzer, J. R. Bond, H. K. Eriksen, J. O. Gundersen, G. A. Hoerning, J. Kim, E. M. Mansfield, S. R. Mason, N. Murray, T. J. Rennie, D. Tolgay, S. Valentine, I. K. Wehus
Source record
Source: Crossref
Published: Mar 1, 2026
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202557864
Open original source ↗Source abstract
We present a stack of data from the second season of the CO Mapping Array Project (COMAP) on the positions of quasars from eBOSS and DESI. COMAP is a line intensity mapping (LIM) experiment targeting dense molecular gas via CO(1–0) emission at z ∼ 3. Season 2 of COMAP represents a factor of three increase in map-level sensitivity over the previous early science data release. We do not detect any CO emission in the stack; instead, we find an upper limit of 10.0 × 10 10 K km s −1 pc 2 at 95% confidence within an ∼18 cMpc box. We compare this upper limit to models of the CO emission stacked on quasars and find a tentative (∼3 σ ) tension between the limit and the brightest stack models after accounting for a suite of additional sources of experimental attenuation and uncertainty, including quasar velocity uncertainty, pipeline signal loss, cosmic variance, and interloper emission in the LIM data. The COMAP-eBOSS/DESI stack is primarily a measurement of the CO luminosity in the quasars’ wider environment, and is therefore potentially subject to environmental effects such as feedback. With our current simple models of the galaxy-halo connection, we are thus unable to confidently rule out any models of cosmic CO with the stack alone. Conversely, the stack’s sensitivity to these large-scale environmental effects has the potential to make it a powerful tool for galaxy formation science, once we are able to constrain the average CO luminosity via the auto-power spectrum (a key goal of COMAP).
Evidence graph
No public relationships recorded yet.
Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.