Indexed metadata

Unique Finite Difference Measurement

Peter C. Fishburn, Helen M. Marcus-Roberts, Fred S. Roberts

Source record

Source: Crossref

Published: Aug 1, 1988

DOI: 10.1137/0401034

Open original source ↗

Source abstract

This paper considers a variety of combinatorial and number-theoretic questions that arise from considerations of uniqueness in the theory of measurement. Given n+1n + 1 objects linearly ordered from worst (smallest) to best (largest), let did_i stand for the difference between objects i and i+1i + 1. Three types of assumptions that allow different inequality and equality comparisons between certain subsets of differences are considered. The three types of assumptions arise from problems concerning the uniqueness of finite algebraic difference measurement and finite subjective probability measurement. If the number of equality comparisons is sufficient to imply that the did_i in d=(d1,d2,,dn)d = ( d_1 ,d_2 , \cdots ,d_n ) are unique up to multiplication by a positive constant, then d is said to be unique. Results on the number of unique d’s and relationships among the components of such d’s are obtained for each of the three types.

Evidence graph

No public relationships recorded yet.

Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.