Indexed metadata

On quasi-normality of function rings

Themba Dube

Source record

Source: Crossref

Published: Feb 1, 2018

DOI: 10.1216/rmj-2018-48-1-157

Open original source ↗

Source abstract

An ff-ring is called quasi-normal if the sum of any two different minimal prime ℓ\ell -ideals is either a maximal ℓ\ell -ideal or the entire ff-ring. Recall that the \textit {zero-component} of a prime ideal PP of a commutative ring AA is the ideal OP={a∈A∣ab=0 for some b∈A∖P}. O_P=\{a\in A\mid ab=0 \mbox { for some } b\in A\setminus P\}. \vspace {0.5pt} \noindent Let C(X)C(X) be the ff-ring of continuous real-valued functions on a Tychonoff space XX. Larson proved that C(βX)C(\beta X) is quasi-normal precisely when C(X)C(X) is quasi-normal and the zero-component of every hyper-real ideal of C(X)C(X) is prime. We show that this result is actually purely ring-theoretic and thus deduce its extension to the ff-rings RL\mathcal {R}L of continuous real-valued functions on a frame LL. A subspace of XX is called a 22-boundary subspace if it is of the form clX(C)∩clX(D)cl _X(C)\cap cl _X(D) for some disjoint cozero-sets CC and DD of XX. For normal spaces, Kimber proved that C(X)C(X) is quasi-normal precisely when every 22-boundary subspace of XX is a PP-space. By viewing spaces as locales, we obtain a characterization along similar lines which does not require normality, namely, for any Tychonoff space XX, C(X)C(X) is quasi-normal if and only if every 22-boundary sublocale of the Lindel\"{o}f reflection of XX in the category of locales is a PP-frame.

Evidence graph

No public relationships recorded yet.

Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.

On quasi-normality of function rings — Mathematical Frontier Network