Indexed metadata

A comparison of two‐stage procedures for testing least‐squares coefficients under heteroscedasticity

Marie Ng, Rand R. Wilcox

Source record

Source: Crossref

Published: Apr 15, 2011

DOI: 10.1348/000711010x508683

Open original source ↗

Source abstract

This study explores the performance of several two‐stage procedures for testing ordinary least‐squares (OLS) coefficients under heteroscedasticity. A test of the usual homoscedasticity assumption is carried out in the first stage of the procedure. Subsequently, a test of the regression coefficients is chosen and performed in the second stage. Three recently developed methods for detecting heteroscedasticity are examined. In addition, three heteroscedastic robust tests of OLS coefficients are considered. A major finding is that performing a test of heteroscedasticity prior to applying a heteroscedastic robust test can lead to poor control over Type I errors.

Evidence graph

No public relationships recorded yet.

Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.

A comparison of two‐stage procedures for testing least‐squares coefficients under heteroscedasticity — Mathematical Frontier Network