Indexed metadata

An analysis of the essential understandings in elementary geometry and a comparison to the common core standards with teaching implications

Helen Crompton, Sarah Ferguson

Source record

Source: Crossref

Published: Apr 1, 2024

DOI: 10.30935/scimath/14361

Open original source ↗

Source abstract

Geometry and spatial reasoning form the foundations of learning in mathematics. However, geometry is a subject often ignored by curriculum writers and teachers until high school, leading to students lacking in critical skills in geometric reasoning. As the United States moves into a new curriculum epoch, heralding the commencement of the national common core standards (CCS), one could question if CCS in geometry align with the essential understandings children need to be successful geometric thinkers. This paper begins with an examination of the essential understandings of geometric reasoning leading to an interpretation and critique of the elementary geometry CCS. Finally, the instructional implications are discussed, considering the common core progression through what we know about how children learn geometry.

Evidence graph

No public relationships recorded yet.

Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.

An analysis of the essential understandings in elementary geometry and a comparison to the common core standards with teaching implications — Mathematical Frontier Network