Unitizing Predicates and Reasoning About the Logic of Proofs
Paul Christian Dawkins, Kyeong Hah Roh
Source record
Source: Crossref
Published: Mar 1, 2024
DOI: 10.5951/jresematheduc-2020-0155
Open original source ↗Source abstract
This article offers the construct unitizing predicates to name mental actions important for students’ reasoning about logic. To unitize a predicate is to conceptualize (possibly complex or multipart) conditions as a single property that every example has or does not have, thereby partitioning a universal set into examples and nonexamples. This explains the cognitive work that supports students to unify various statements with the same logical form, which is conventionally represented by replacing parts of statements with logical variables p or P ( x ). Using data from a constructivist teaching experiment with two undergraduate students, we document barriers to unitizing predicates and demonstrate how this activity influences students’ ability to render mathematical statements and proofs as having the same logical structure.
Evidence graph
No public relationships recorded yet.
Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.