Quantifying Multi-Cause Psychological Disorder Risk Through an Advanced Mathematical Model Using Intuitionistic Pentagonal Fuzzy Logic
Aiman Ishtiaq, Khadija Tul Kubra, Anns Uzair, Awais Ali
Source abstract
The evaluation of psychological disorders is a very complicated and sensitive area of study, where emotions, thoughts, and the mental states of different patients are analyzed on the basis of questionnaires and observational techniques. The identification and analysis of people's mental states, emotions, and behaviors are difficult and limited with the aid of conventional approaches since the data gathered from these factors appear to be vague, uncertain, and imprecise. To demonstrate this information systematically, we have proposed a comprehensive mathematical model able to deal with indeterminate and imprecise data, utilizing Intuitionistic Pentagonal Fuzzy Numbers (IPnFNs). To create a coherent mathematical framework, IPnFNs integrate five values of membership and non-membership functions of any constraint, providing an innovative numerical framework that effectively explains the assessment of diagnosis and the patient's condition. The research study analyzes several key psychiatric disorders, such as childhood psychiatric problems, hormonal changes, social stress, cognitive distortions, anxiety, and traumatic life events, as the main factors. The proposed technique provides psychologists with a thorough and clear picture of the issue by depicting the patient's mental health numerically. The research is significantly helpful in cases where the symptoms of psychological illness are not obvious or the patient's information is imprecise or confusing. Furthermore, a comparative analysis of various patients can be developed using the proposed technique, assisting in assessing severity and diagnosis preferences. This mathematical method shows that the use of IPnFNs can be a reliable and scientific method in the evaluation of psychological disorders. This approach is significantly applicable in educational counseling and clinical psychology, where it is a daily routine for individuals to deal with imprecise and inconsistent data in mental health issues while making decisions.
Evidence graph
No public relationships recorded yet.
Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.