Indexed metadata

Beyond Worst-Case Coreset Bounds for kk-Clustering via Determinantal Sampling

Diptarka Chakraborty, Satyaki Mukherjee, Gaurav Vallabhdas Revankar, Hoang-Son Tran

Source record

Source: arXiv

Published: Sep 6, 2026

arXiv: 2609.06394

Open original source ↗

Source abstract

Massive datasets in modern machine learning have made data reduction a central challenge, particularly for clustering tasks where memory and computational constraints demand compact yet faithful summaries. A standard approach is to construct an \textit{εε-coreset}: a small weighted subset that approximately preserves the clustering cost for every plausible choice of centers. For the \textit{(k,z)(k,z)-clustering problem}, existing worst-case bounds on coreset size are essentially tight, ruling out substantially smaller coresets in general. However, such worst-case instances are often unrepresentative of real-world data. In this work, we show that significantly smaller coresets are possible under mild and natural assumptions on the underlying data distribution. We introduce a new correlated sampling framework, called \textit{determinantal sampling}, based on a novel application of determinantal point processes. Using this framework, we obtain an efficiently constructible ε\varepsilon-coreset for (k,z)(k,z)-clustering in Rd\mathbb R^d whose dependence on 1/ε1/\varepsilon has exponent strictly smaller than 22 when dd is fixed. This improves over the worst-case ε2\varepsilon^{-2} barrier under our beyond-worst-case assumptions. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first result that provably surpasses these lower bounds through beyond-worst-case assumptions. Finally, we validate our approach on synthetic and real-world benchmark datasets, where it consistently achieves smaller coresets than existing state-of-the-art methods, even without explicitly enforcing the assumptions used in the analysis.

Evidence graph

No public relationships recorded yet.

Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.