Indexed metadata

Homomorphisms of Sparse Signed Graphs

Clément Charpentier, Reza Naserasr, Éric Sopena

Source record

Source: Crossref

Published: Jul 10, 2020

DOI: 10.37236/8478

Open original source ↗

Source abstract

The notion of homomorphism of signed graphs, introduced quite recently, provides better interplay with the notion of minor and is thus of high importance in graph coloring. A newer, but equivalent, definition of homomorphisms of signed graphs, proposed jointly by the second and third authors of this paper and Thomas Zaslavsky, leads to a basic no-homomorphism lemma. According to this definition, a signed graph (G,σ)(G, \sigma) admits a homomorphism to a signed graph (H,π)(H, \pi) if there is a mapping ϕ\phi from the vertices and edges of GG to the vertices and edges of HH (respectively) which preserves adjacencies, incidences, and signs of closed walks (i.e., the product of the sign of their edges). For ij=00,01,10,11ij=00, 01, 10, 11, let gij(G,σ)g_{ij}(G,\sigma) be the length of a shortest nontrivial closed walk of (G,σ)(G, \sigma) which is, positive and of even length for ij=00ij=00, positive and of odd length for ij=01ij=01, negative and of even length for ij=10ij=10, negative and of odd length for ij=11ij=11. For each ijij, if there is no nontrivial closed walk of the corresponding type, we let gij(G,σ)=∞g_{ij}(G, \sigma)=\infty. If GG is bipartite, then g01(G,σ)=g11(G,σ)=∞g_{01}(G,\sigma)=g_{11}(G,\sigma)=\infty. In this case, g10(G,σ)g_{10}(G,\sigma) is certainly realized by a cycle of GG, and it will be referred to as the \emph{unbalanced-girth} of (G,σ)(G,\sigma). It then follows that if (G,σ)(G,\sigma) admits a homomorphism to (H,π)(H, \pi), then gij(G,σ)≥gij(H,π)g_{ij}(G, \sigma)\geq g_{ij}(H, \pi) for ij∈{00,01,10,11}ij \in \{00, 01,10,11\}. Studying the restriction of homomorphisms of signed graphs on sparse families, in this paper we first prove that for any given signed graph (H,π)(H, \pi), there exists a positive value of ϵ\epsilon such that, if GG is a connected graph of maximum average degree less than 2+ϵ2+\epsilon, and if σ\sigma is a signature of GG such that gij(G,σ)≥gij(H,π)g_{ij}(G, \sigma)\geq g_{ij}(H, \pi) for all ij∈{00,01,10,11}ij \in \{00, 01,10,11\}, then (G,σ)(G, \sigma) admits a homomorphism to (H,π)(H, \pi). For (H,π)(H, \pi) being the signed graph on K4K_4 with exactly one negative edge, we show that ϵ=47\epsilon=\frac{4}{7} works and that this is the best possible value of ϵ\epsilon. For (H,π)(H, \pi) being the negative cycle of length 2g2g, denoted UC2gUC_{2g}, we show that ϵ=12g−1\epsilon=\frac{1}{2g-1} works. As a bipartite analogue of the Jaeger-Zhang conjecture, Naserasr, Sopena and Rollovà conjectured in [Homomorphisms of signed graphs, {\em J. Graph Theory} 79 (2015)] that every signed bipartite planar graph (G,σ)(G,\sigma) satisfying gij(G,σ)≥4g−2g_{ij}(G,\sigma)\geq 4g-2 admits a homomorphism to UC2gUC_{2g}. We show that 4g−24g-2 cannot be strengthened, and, supporting the conjecture, we prove it for planar signed bipartite graphs (G,σ)(G,\sigma) satisfying the weaker condition gij(G,σ)≥8g−2g_{ij}(G,\sigma)\geq 8g-2. In the course of our work, we also provide a duality theorem to decide whether a 2-edge-colored graph admits a homomorphism to a certain class of 2-edge-colored signed graphs or not.

Evidence graph

No public relationships recorded yet.

Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.