Indexed metadata

Treewidth of Generalized Hamming Graph, Bipartite Kneser Graph and Generalized Petersen Graph

Yichen Wang, Mengyu Cao, Zequn Lv, Mei Lu

Source record

Source: Crossref

Published: Jan 9, 2026

DOI: 10.37236/12892

Open original source ↗

Source abstract

Let t,qt,q and nn be positive integers. Write [q]={1,2,,q}[q] = \{1,2,\ldots,q\}. The generalized Hamming graph H(t,q,n)H(t,q,n) is the graph whose vertex set is the cartesian product of nn copies of [q][q] (q2)(q\ge 2), where two vertices are adjacent if their Hamming distance is at most tt. In particular, H(1,q,n)H(1,q,n) is the well-known Hamming graph and H(1,2,n)H(1,2,n) is the hypercube. In 2006, Chandran and Kavitha described the asymptotic value of tw(H(1,q,n))tw(H(1,q,n)), where tw(G)tw(G) denotes the treewidth of GG. In this paper, we give the exact pathwidth of H(t,2,n)H(t,2,n) and show that tw(H(t,q,n))=Θ(tqn/n)tw(H(t,q,n)) = \Theta(tq^n/\sqrt{n}) when nn goes to infinity. Based on those results, we show that the treewidth of bipartite Kneser graph BK(n,k)BK(n,k) is (nk)1\binom{n}{k} - 1 when nn is sufficient large relative to kk and the bounds of tw(BK(2k+1,k))tw(BK(2k+1,k)) are given. Moreover, we present the bounds of the treewidth of generalized Petersen graph.

Evidence graph

No public relationships recorded yet.

Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.