Indexed metadata

The packing and covering number of trees are local

Caelan Atamanchuk, Simon Briend, Serte Donderwinkel, Elaine Herrera

Source record

Source: arXiv

Published: Oct 27, 2026

arXiv: 2610.37539

Open original source ↗

Source abstract

For a graph, its rr-packing number is the size of the largest rr-separated set and its rr-covering number is the size of the smallest rr-net. We show that the rr-covering number and rr-packing number are continuous in the fringe topology on locally finite trees. This recovers convergence results by Meir and Moon for e.g. uniform binary trees, uniform plane trees, uniform Polyá trees and random recursive trees, and proves new results for many other tree models, such as size-conditioned Bienaymé trees, simply generated trees, mm-ary search trees, the minimum spanning tree of the complete graph and preferential attachment trees. Moreover, our formulation provides an intuitive interpretation of the limiting constant, that also provides an easy route for explicit computations in the case of size-conditioned Bienaymé trees. Our method relies on the definition of a canonical minimum rr-net, and a relation between covering numbers and packing numbers due to Meir and Moon.

Evidence graph

No public relationships recorded yet.

Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.

The packing and covering number of trees are local — Mathematical Frontier Network