Indexed metadata

What Details Do Teachers Expect From Student Proofs? A Study of Proof Checking in Geometry

Justin K. Dimmel, Patricio G. Herbst

Source record

Source: Crossref

Published: May 1, 2018

DOI: 10.5951/jresematheduc.49.3.0261

Open original source ↗

Source abstract

We investigated how secondary mathematics teachers check student geometry proofs. From video records of geometry teachers checking proofs, we conjectured that teachers have different expectations for details that follow from written statements than for details that are conveyed by diagrams. To test our conjectures, we randomly assigned 44 secondary mathematics teachers to 1 of 3 experiment groups ( n & 13, n & 15, n & 16) in which they viewed and rated representations of instructional practice. Participants in each group viewed treatment or control versions of instructional scenarios and rated the appropriateness of the teachers' work in different segments of each scenario. We compared participants' ratings across and within experiment groups. We found that participants rated lower instruction that deviated from what we hypothesized to be their expectations, confirming our hypotheses.

Evidence graph

No public relationships recorded yet.

Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.

What Details Do Teachers Expect From Student Proofs? A Study of Proof Checking in Geometry — Mathematical Frontier Network