“Let’s Ask the Robot!”: Epistemic Stance Between Teacher Candidates Toward AI in Mathematics Lesson Planning
Eunhye Flavin, Sunghwan Hwang, Melita Morales
Source record
Source: Crossref
Published: Mar 29, 2025
DOI: 10.1177/00224871251325079
Open original source ↗Source abstract
Generative artificial intelligence (AI)-powered conversation agents such as ChatGPT are increasingly being used in teacher education. Although ChatGPT can provide ample resources for lesson planning, little attention has been paid to how teacher candidates construct prompts and evaluate AI-generated outputs in real time to develop lesson plans. Taking up Bisconti et al.’s conceptualization of generative AI as a social agent in a sociotechnical system, this article investigates how knowledge construction is dynamic and negotiated through interaction when using ChatGPT to develop lesson plans. We applied conversation analysis through Heritage’s gradient model of epistemic stance––which captures moment-to-moment expressions of social relationships––to analyze how teacher candidates position their knowledge in relation to that acquired from ChatGPT, as managed through their prompts and questions. Our findings aim to offer insights to help teacher educators develop scaffolds for teacher candidates to critically curate content from AI-powered agents and identify areas needing further instructional support.
Evidence graph
No public relationships recorded yet.
Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.