Grothendieck Universes
Karol Pąk
Source record
Source: Crossref
Published: Jul 1, 2020
DOI: 10.2478/forma-2020-0018
Open original source ↗Source abstract
Summary The foundation of the Mizar Mathematical Library [2], is first-order Tarski-Grothendieck set theory. However, the foundation explicitly refers only to Tarski’s Axiom A, which states that for every set X there is a Tarski universe U such that X ∈ U . In this article, we prove, using the Mizar [3] formalism, that the Grothendieck name is justified. We show the relationship between Tarski and Grothendieck universe. First we prove in Theorem (17) that every Grothendieck universe satisfies Tarski’s Axiom A. Then in Theorem (18) we prove that every Grothendieck universe that contains a given set X , even the least (with respect to inclusion) denoted by GrothendieckUniverse X , has as a subset the least (with respect to inclusion) Tarski universe that contains X , denoted by the Tarski-Class X . Since Tarski universes, as opposed to Grothendieck universes [5], might not be transitive (called epsilon-transitive in the Mizar Mathematical Library [1]) we focused our attention to demonstrate that Tarski-Class X ⊊ GrothendieckUniverse X for some X . Then we show in Theorem (19) that Tarski-Class X where X is the singleton of any infinite set is a proper subset of GrothendieckUniverse X . Finally we show that Tarski-Class X = GrothendieckUniverse X holds under the assumption that X is a transitive set. The formalisation is an extension of the formalisation used in [4].
Evidence graph
No public relationships recorded yet.
Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.