Indexed metadata

Generalized Power Domination in Regular Graphs

Paul Dorbec, Michael A. Henning, Christian Löwenstein, Mickael Montassier, André Raspaud

Source record

Source: Crossref

Published: Jan 1, 2013

DOI: 10.1137/120891356

Open original source ↗

Source abstract

In this paper, we continue the study of power domination in graphs (see [T. W. Haynes et al., SIAM J. Discrete Math., 15 (2002), pp. 519--529; P. Dorbec et al., SIAM J. Discrete Math., 22 (2008), pp. 554--567; A. Aazami et al., SIAM J. Discrete Math., 23 (2009), pp. 1382--1399]). Power domination in graphs was birthed from the problem of monitoring an electric power system by placing as few measurement devices in the system as possible. A set of vertices is defined to be a power dominating set of a graph if every vertex and every edge in the system is monitored by the set following a set of rules (according to Kirschoff laws) for power system monitoring. The minimum cardinality of a power dominating set of a graph is its power domination number. We show that the power domination of a connected cubic graph on nn vertices different from K3,3K_{3,3} is at most n/4n/4 and this bound is tight. More generally, we show that for k≥1k \ge 1, the kk-power domination number of a connected (k+2)(k+2)-regular graph on nn vertices different from Kk+2,k+2K_{k+2,k+2} is at most n/(k+3)n/(k+3), where the 11-power domination number is the ordinary power domination number. We show that these bounds are tight.

Evidence graph

No public relationships recorded yet.

Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.

Generalized Power Domination in Regular Graphs — Mathematical Frontier Network