Indexed metadata

Scientific Expertise and Comparative Criminal Procedure

Peter Alldridge

Source record

Source: Crossref

Published: Jul 1, 1999

DOI: 10.1177/136571279900300301

Open original source ↗

Source abstract

… the legacy of postmodernism is that truth is not fixed, meanings are ‘located’ provisionally, not ‘discovered’ and people who ‘find’ truth, whether judges, juries, critics, or, yes, even scientists, have interests — social, economic, political, racial, gender — that affect how they see the world. However much we may be convinced of the merits of the Anglo-Saxon judicial system, the courtroom is not the best place, and the adversary procedure is not the right method, to decide what is and what is not a science.

Evidence graph

No public relationships recorded yet.

Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.

Scientific Expertise and Comparative Criminal Procedure — Mathematical Frontier Network