Indexed metadata

A Universal, Provably Uniform Conditioning Framework via Negative Binomial Convergence

Randy Kuang

Source record

Source: Crossref

Published: Aug 19, 2026

DOI: 10.20944/preprints202608.1348.v1

Open original source ↗

Source abstract

Existing randomness conditioning methods face a fundamental dilemma: heuristic post-processing lacks rigorous mathematical uniformity guarantees, while provable seeded extractors require an independent perfectly uniform seed, merely shifting the trust assumption. We present a universal, mathematically certified conditioning framework that resolves this dilemma. For any NIST SP~800-90B ESV-certified entropy source, regardless of bias or implementation, our framework generates a provably uniform output stream without requiring any external seed or heuristic whitening. The core contribution is the Geometric Convergence Theorem (GCT), proving that the modular reduction of a negative binomial counting variable Np∼NB(m,p) N_p \sim \mathrm{NB}(m, p) —where m denotes the required number of successes generated from fixed ESV entropy blocks via Bernoulli trials with success probability p—converges exponentially to uniformity over ZR \mathbb{Z}_R , with spectral radius ρNB=p/p2+4(1−p)sin⁡2(π/R)<1 \rho_{\mathrm{NB}} = p / \sqrt{p^2 + 4(1-p)\sin^2(\pi/R)} < 1 . A Practical Entropy Budgeting mechanism ensures information-theoretic entropy conservation via a fixed input-output ratio. In a large-scale validation generating 100 MB of output from a biased ESV source (Hin H_{\mathrm{in}} =3.32 bits/byte), the framework achieved Shannon entropy 7.999998 bits/byte and Min-Entropy 7.9936 bits/byte, approaching the theoretical lower bound of 7.9949 bits/byte to within 0.0013 bits/byte, withχ2=275.95 \chi^2 = 275.95 (df = 255). This establishes the first seedless, provable, and platform-agnostic conditioning framework for certified entropy sources.

Evidence graph

No public relationships recorded yet.

Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.