Representing Graphs via Pattern Avoiding Words
Miles Jones, Sergey Kitaev, Artem Pyatkin, Jeffrey Remmel
Source abstract
The notion of a word-representable graph has been studied in a series of papers in the literature. A graph is word-representable if there exists a word over the alphabet such that letters and alternate in if and only if is an edge in . If , this is equivalent to saying that is word-representable if for all , if and only if the subword of consisting of all occurrences of or in has no consecutive occurrence of the pattern 11.In this paper, we introduce the study of -representable graphs for any word . A graph is -representable if and only if there is a vertex-labeled version of , , and a word such that for all , if and only if has no consecutive occurrence of the pattern . Thus, word-representable graphs are just -representable graphs. We show that for any , every finite graph is -representable. This contrasts with the fact that not all graphs are 11-representable graphs.The main focus of the paper is the study of -representable graphs. In particular, we classify the -representable trees. We show that any -representable graph is a comparability graph and the class of -representable graphs include the classes of co-interval graphs and permutation graphs. We also state a number of facts on -representation of induced subgraphs of a grid graph.
Evidence graph
No public relationships recorded yet.
Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.