Indexed metadata

Branch-and-Bound versus Lift-and-Project Relaxations in Combinatorial Optimization

Gérard Cornuéjols, Yatharth Dubey

Source record

Source: Crossref

Published: Jul 1, 2025

DOI: 10.1007/s10107-025-02248-7

Open original source ↗

Source abstract

Abstract In this note, we consider a theoretical framework for comparing branch-and-bound with classical lift-and-project hierarchies. We simplify our analysis by streamlining the definition of branch-and-bound. We introduce “skewed k -trees” which give a hierarchy of relaxations that is incomparable to that of Sherali-Adams, and we show that it is much better for some instances. We also give an example where lift-and-project does very well and branch-and-bound does not. Finally, we study the set of branch-and-bound trees of height at most k and “squeeze” their effectiveness between two well-known lift-and-project procedures.

Evidence graph

No public relationships recorded yet.

Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.

Branch-and-Bound versus Lift-and-Project Relaxations in Combinatorial Optimization — Mathematical Frontier Network