Branch-and-Bound versus Lift-and-Project Relaxations in Combinatorial Optimization
Gérard Cornuéjols, Yatharth Dubey
Source record
Source: Crossref
Published: Jul 1, 2025
DOI: 10.1007/s10107-025-02248-7
Open original source ↗Source abstract
Abstract In this note, we consider a theoretical framework for comparing branch-and-bound with classical lift-and-project hierarchies. We simplify our analysis by streamlining the definition of branch-and-bound. We introduce “skewed k -trees” which give a hierarchy of relaxations that is incomparable to that of Sherali-Adams, and we show that it is much better for some instances. We also give an example where lift-and-project does very well and branch-and-bound does not. Finally, we study the set of branch-and-bound trees of height at most k and “squeeze” their effectiveness between two well-known lift-and-project procedures.
Evidence graph
No public relationships recorded yet.
Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.