Indexed metadata

Discounted Hitting Domination on Graphs with Submodularity, Complexity and Exact Algorithms

Julian D. Allagan, Kevin Pereyra, William A. Massey

Source record

Source: arXiv

Published: Sep 25, 2026

arXiv: 2609.31535

Open original source ↗

Source abstract

On a network with a fixed set of verified sources, discounted averaging induces an equilibrium support hiS=Ei[λTS]h_i^S=\mathbb{E}_i[λ^{T_S}], the discounted probability that a random walk reaches SS before attenuation. We define the \emph{discounted hitting domination number} δλ,τ(G)δ_{λ,τ}(G) as the minimum number of sources required to guarantee hiS≥τh_i^S\geτ at every vertex. Although this potential is known through penalized and group hitting probabilities, the associated minimum-cardinality uniform-coverage problem appears to be new. Aggregate support is monotone submodular, while the uniform-floor problem is an exact submodular-cover problem. Moreover, if λr+1<τ≤(λΔ)rλ^{r+1}<τ\le\left(\fracλΔ\right)^r, then δλ,τ(G)δ_{λ,τ}(G) equals the distance-rr domination number. This yields NP-completeness and APX-completeness at (λ,τ)=(1/4,1/14)(λ,τ)=(1/4,1/14) on graphs of maximum degree three. For spiders, we obtain an exact finite-state characterization and a polynomial-time algorithm for every fixed rational pair (λ,τ)(λ,τ), and show that the branching vertex need not belong to a minimum source set. Finally, an exact mixed-integer linear formulation certifies optimal placements on a real network and a synthetic graph and demonstrates substantial differences from degree, closeness, and classical domination.

Evidence graph

No public relationships recorded yet.

Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.