Indexed metadata

MM^{*}-matrices: Tridiagonal structure and signature similarity to MM-matrices

Minikumari N. S., Sreekumar K. G., Elsayed M. Elsayed, Linda J. P., Rajeswari B.

Source record

Source: Crossref

Published: Sep 6, 2026

DOI: 10.13069/jacodesmath.v13i3.446

Open original source ↗

Source abstract

This paper introduces and studies a new class of matrices, called MM^{*}-matrices. These matrices have a prescribed tridiagonal sign structure together with the positivity of all principal minors. Specifically, MM^{*}-matrices are matrices with positive diagonal entries, positive first sub- and super-diagonal entries, non-positive entries outside the tridiagonal band, and positive principal minors. The specified sign structure and characteristics of MM^*-matrices extend both classical tridiagonal MM-matrices and totally positive tridiagonal matrices. We identify the subclass, denoted by MTM_T^{*}, consisting of all tridiagonal MM^{*}-matrices, such that each matrix in this class is always diagonally signature-similar to a tridiagonal MM-matrix. The classical MM-matrix theory can be transferred directly to this subclass. In particular, MT M_T^{*}-matrices admit LULU factorizations without pivoting with positive pivots, have eigenvalues with positive real parts, exhibit inverse-sign regularity, and possess invariance of induced norm condition numbers. The symmetric MTM_T^{*}-matrices coincide with Jacobi matrices and are therefore positive definite, admitting Cholesky factorizations and strict eigenvalue interlacing. We also investigate scaling invariance and numerical conditioning. Applications of this structured tridiagonal system arise in compartmental and population models with alternating nearest-neighbor transfer. This paper illustrates the natural occurrence of MM^{*}-matrices in applied and computational settings. Received: 07 March 2026 | Accepted: 30 April 2026

Evidence graph

No public relationships recorded yet.

Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.