Source authenticated

Is block sensitivity at most quadratic in spectral sensitivity? (Aaronson, Ben-David, Kothari, Rao and Tal)

Theorem 6.1: a total Boolean function on 2,017,584 variables with bs(f)≥14011\mathrm{bs}(f)\ge14011 and λ(f)≤89.0162\lambda(f)\le89.0162, so bs(f)≥λ(f)2.127\mathrm{bs}(f)\ge\lambda(f)^{2.127}; composition gives a family with λ→∞\lambda\to\infty and bs=Ω(λ2.127)\mathrm{bs}=\Omega(\lambda^{2.127}), so no quadratic bound holds. The function is a union of subcubes indexed by a doubly regular tournament with gates fixed by the Lovász local lemma. An exponent near 2.20 on 1,255 variables is numerical evidence only. The true exponent, between 2.127 and 4, stays open. Since λ(f)≤s(f)\lambda(f)\le s(f), OpenAI's later disproof of bs=O(s2)\mathrm{bs}=O(s^2) (25 September 2026), which adapts this gated-tournament construction, implies this result.

Exact FrontierDelta

Prior state unknown→disproved

Scope and record

Occurred: Aug 1, 2026

Delta type: SOURCE CLAIM

Assumptions: VibeMathed verification: lean-checked. Publication: preprint. AI contribution: ai-co-developed. VibeMathed editorial classifications, scores, notes, relations, and dataset structure are CC BY 4.0. Source statements and linked content retain their own rights.

Canonical aliases: Is block sensitivity at most quadratic in spectral sensitivity? (Aaronson, Ben-David, Kothari, Rao and Tal) · Block sensitivity vs spectral sensitivity squared

Confidence: Not scored

Registry verification: lean checked · preprint · candidate

Open the source record ↗

Attribution

VibeMathed
registry · event recorded by

GPT-5.6-Sol (ideas)
model · ai model contributor · maker attribution ambiguous: OpenAI, Anthropic, Harmonic

Claude Opus 5 with Harmonic's Aristotle (Lean)
model · ai model contributor · maker attribution ambiguous: OpenAI, Anthropic, Harmonic

Alexander Meiburg
human · human collaborator

Artifacts and verifiers

Lean formalization: Timeroot/BS_Lam

lean artifact · pending

Artifact ↗
Headline Lean statements (BSLambda/Main.lean)

formal registration · pending

Artifact ↗

Compute record

No linked compute attempts recorded.

Lineage and corrections

Is block sensitivity at most quadratic in spectral sensitivity? (Aaronson, Ben-David, Kothari, Rao and Tal) parent of this event

This event attributed to Claude Opus 5 with Harmonic's Aristotle (Lean)

VibeMathed record: Is block sensitivity at most quadratic in spectral sensitivity? (Aaronson, Ben-David, Kothari, Rao and Tal) evidence for this event

This event attributed to GPT-5.6-Sol (ideas)

Lean formalization: Timeroot/BS_Lam evidence for this event

This event attributed to Alexander Meiburg

Meiburg, Block sensitivity can exceed spectral sensitivity squared (arXiv:2608.00851), the construction this adapts evidence for this event

Theorem 6.1: a total Boolean function on 2,017,584 variables with bs(f)≥14011\mathrm{bs}(f)\ge14011 and λ(f)≤89.0162\lambda(f)\le89.0162, so bs(f)≥λ(f)2.127\mathrm{bs}(f)\ge\lambda(f)^{2.127}; composition gives a family with λ→∞\lambda\to\infty and bs=Ω(λ2.127)\mathrm{bs}=\Omega(\lambda^{2.127}), so no quadratic bound holds. The function is a union of subcubes indexed by a doubly regular tournament with gates fixed by the Lovász local lemma. An exponent near 2.20 on 1,255 variables is numerical evidence only. The true exponent, between 2.127 and 4, stays open. Since λ(f)≤s(f)\lambda(f)\le s(f), OpenAI's later disproof of bs=O(s2)\mathrm{bs}=O(s^2) (25 September 2026), which adapts this gated-tournament construction, implies this result. parent of this event

Headline Lean statements (BSLambda/Main.lean) evidence for this event

Aaronson-Ben-David-Kothari-Rao-Tal, Degree vs. approximate degree (arXiv) evidence for this event

Stronger later result: block sensitivity is not quadratic in sensitivity (OpenAI release) evidence for this event

Act on this frontier

Verify, challenge, or extend the result.