theoretical-computer-science / Boolean function complexity; sensitivity

Is block sensitivity at most quadratic in spectral sensitivity? (Aaronson, Ben-David, Kothari, Rao and Tal)

Theorem 6.1: a total Boolean function on 2,017,584 variables with bs(f)≥14011\mathrm{bs}(f)\ge14011 and λ(f)≤89.0162\lambda(f)\le89.0162, so bs(f)≥λ(f)2.127\mathrm{bs}(f)\ge\lambda(f)^{2.127}; composition gives a family with λ→∞\lambda\to\infty and bs=Ω(λ2.127)\mathrm{bs}=\Omega(\lambda^{2.127}), so no quadratic bound holds. The function is a union of subcubes indexed by a doubly regular tournament with gates fixed by the Lovász local lemma. An exponent near 2.20 on 1,255 variables is numerical evidence only. The true exponent, between 2.127 and 4, stays open. Since λ(f)≤s(f)\lambda(f)\le s(f), OpenAI's later disproof of bs=O(s2)\mathrm{bs}=O(s^2) (25 September 2026), which adapts this gated-tournament construction, implies this result.

22Significance / 100
1Frontier events
0Verification tasks
0Recorded attempts

Temporal state

Current frontier

No reconciled state yet.

Append-only history

Frontier timeline

theoretical-computer-scienceAug 1, 2026Significance 22/100Registry: lean checked

Is block sensitivity at most quadratic in spectral sensitivity? (Aaronson, Ben-David, Kothari, Rao and Tal)

Prior state unknown→disproved

Theorem 6.1: a total Boolean function on 2,017,584 variables with bs(f)≥14011\mathrm{bs}(f)\ge14011 and λ(f)≤89.0162\lambda(f)\le89.0162, so bs(f)≥λ(f)2.127\mathrm{bs}(f)\ge\lambda(f)^{2.127}; composition gives a family with λ→∞\lambda\to\infty and bs=Ω(λ2.127)\mathrm{bs}=\Omega(\lambda^{2.127}), so no quadratic bound holds. The function is a union of subcubes indexed by a doubly regular tournament with gates fixed by the Lovász local lemma. An exponent near…

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review

Research memory

Claims and attempts

Scoped claims

Source authenticated

Theorem 6.1: a total Boolean function on 2,017,584 variables with bs(f)≥14011\mathrm{bs}(f)\ge14011 and λ(f)≤89.0162\lambda(f)\le89.0162, so bs(f)≥λ(f)2.127\mathrm{bs}(f)\ge\lambda(f)^{2.127}; composition gives a family with λ→∞\lambda\to\infty and bs=Ω(λ2.127)\mathrm{bs}=\Omega(\lambda^{2.127}), so no quadratic bound holds. The function is a union of subcubes indexed by a doubly regular tournament with gates fixed by the Lovász local lemma. An exponent near 2.20 on 1,255 variables is numerical evidence only. The true exponent, between 2.127 and 4, stays open. Since λ(f)≤s(f)\lambda(f)\le s(f), OpenAI's later disproof of bs=O(s2)\mathrm{bs}=O(s^2) (25 September 2026), which adapts this gated-tournament construction, implies this result.

Theorem 6.1: a total Boolean function on 2,017,584 variables with bs(f)≥14011\mathrm{bs}(f)\ge14011 and λ(f)≤89.0162\lambda(f)\le89.0162, so bs(f)≥λ(f)2.127\mathrm{bs}(f)\ge\lambda(f)^{2.127}; composition gives a family with λ→∞\lambda\to\infty and bs=Ω(λ2.127)\mathrm{bs}=\Omega(\lambda^{2.127}), so no quadratic bound holds. The function is a union of subcubes indexed by a doubly regular tournament with gates fixed by the Lovász local lemma. An exponent near 2.20 on 1,255 variables is numerical evidence only. The true exponent, between 2.127 and 4, stays open. Since λ(f)≤s(f)\lambda(f)\le s(f), OpenAI's later disproof of bs=O(s2)\mathrm{bs}=O(s^2) (25 September 2026), which adapts this gated-tournament construction, implies this result.

Recorded attempts

Evidence graph

Connected research record