Source authenticated

Central limit theorem for the random assignment problem

Claims the central limit theorem for the bipartite random assignment problem with bounded uniform costs: n (Cn−ζ(2))⇒N(0, 4ζ(2)−4ζ(3))\sqrt{n}\,(C_n-\zeta(2)) \Rightarrow \mathcal{N}(0,\,4\zeta(2)-4\zeta(3)). The limiting constant is not itself new - Wästlund had computed exactly 4ζ(2)−4ζ(3)4\zeta(2)-4\zeta(3) for the mean-one exponential model, and Malatesta, Parisi and Sicuro derived the non-bipartite analogue by replicas - but neither is a proof for the bounded bipartite model, and Wästlund's zero-free-disk conjecture, which would imply a Gaussian limit, remains open. So the value was expected; the proof of convergence to it is what is claimed. The route is an exact change of variables on an optimal dual potential, after which the residual dependence is a single directed-tree factor whose matrix-tree determinant becomes triangular once the potentials are ordered.

Exact FrontierDelta

proved→proved

Scope and record

Occurred: Oct 29, 2026

Delta type: REGISTRY REVISION

Assumptions: VibeMathed verification: unreviewed. Publication: preprint. AI contribution: ai-co-developed. VibeMathed editorial classifications, scores, notes, relations, and dataset structure are CC BY 4.0. Source statements and linked content retain their own rights.

Canonical aliases: Central limit theorem for the random assignment problem · CLT for random assignment

Confidence: Not scored

Registry verification: unreviewed · preprint · resolved

Open the source record ↗

Attribution

VibeMathed
registry · event recorded by

ChatGPT 5.6
model · ai model contributor · OpenAI

Opus 5
model · ai model contributor · Anthropic

Gilles Mordant
human · human collaborator

Lineage and corrections

Corrects Central limit theorem for the random assignment problem →

Supersedes Central limit theorem for the random assignment problem →

VibeMathed record: Central limit theorem for the random assignment problem evidence for this event

This event attributed to ChatGPT 5.6

Central limit theorem for the random assignment problem parent of this event

Aldous, The zeta(2) limit in the random assignment problem evidence for this event

This event attributed to Gilles Mordant

Claims the central limit theorem for the bipartite random assignment problem with bounded uniform costs: n (Cn−ζ(2))⇒N(0, 4ζ(2)−4ζ(3))\sqrt{n}\,(C_n-\zeta(2)) \Rightarrow \mathcal{N}(0,\,4\zeta(2)-4\zeta(3)). The limiting constant is not itself new - Wästlund had computed exactly 4ζ(2)−4ζ(3)4\zeta(2)-4\zeta(3) for the mean-one exponential model, and Malatesta, Parisi and Sicuro derived the non-bipartite analogue by replicas - but neither is a proof for the bounded bipartite model, and Wästlund's zero-free-disk conjecture, which would imply a Gaussian limit, remains open. So the value was expected; the proof of convergence to it is what is claimed. The route is an exact change of variables on an optimal dual potential, after which the residual dependence is a single directed-tree factor whose matrix-tree determinant becomes triangular once the potentials are ordered. parent of this event

This event attributed to Opus 5

Central limit theorem for the random assignment problem evidence for this event

Act on this frontier

Verify, challenge, or extend the result.

Central limit theorem for the random assignment problem — Mathematical Frontier Network