Source authenticated

The Hajlasz-Onninen endpoint question for the centered maximal function, planar disk case: is ∥∇Mf∥1≤C∥∇f∥1\|\nabla Mf\|_1\le C\|\nabla f\|_1 on W1,1(R2)W^{1,1}(\mathbb R^2)?

Theorem 1.1: there is an absolute C<∞C<\infty such that for every real f∈W1,1(R2)f\in W^{1,1}(\mathbb R^2) the centered disk maximal function MfMf is locally integrable, lies in Wloc1,1(R2)W^{1,1}_{loc}(\mathbb R^2) and satisfies ∫∣∇Mf∣≤C∫∣∇f∣\int|\nabla Mf|\le C\int|\nabla f|. The key step is a signed finite-band estimate for sup⁡a≤t≤bAtg\sup_{a\le t\le b}A_tg uniform in the number of dyadic scales, combined with Lahti-Weigt's conditional regularity theorem. Not shown: dimensions n≥3n\ge3, balls in other norms, the BV (variation) version, the optimal constant, or continuity of f↦∇Mff\mapsto\nabla Mf.

Exact FrontierDelta

Prior state unknown→proved

Scope and record

Occurred: Sep 26, 2026

Delta type: SOURCE CLAIM

Assumptions: VibeMathed verification: lean-checked. Publication: announcement. AI contribution: ai-discovered. VibeMathed editorial classifications, scores, notes, relations, and dataset structure are CC BY 4.0. Source statements and linked content retain their own rights.

Canonical aliases: The Hajlasz-Onninen endpoint question for the centered maximal function, planar disk case: is $\|\nabla Mf\|_1\le C\|\nabla f\|_1$ on $W^{1,1}(\mathbb R^2)$? · Hajlasz-Onninen question, planar centered case

Confidence: Not scored

Registry verification: lean checked · announcement · partial

Open the source record ↗

Attribution

VibeMathed
registry · event recorded by

Unreleased internal OpenAI model
model · ai model contributor · OpenAI

Artifacts and verifiers

Lean comparator statement: DiskMaximal.lean

lean artifact · pending

Artifact ↗
Lean solution module: OAI/Analysis/DiskMaximal/Main.lean

lean artifact · pending

Artifact ↗

Compute record

No linked compute attempts recorded.

Lineage and corrections

Lean comparator statement: DiskMaximal.lean evidence for this event

The Hajlasz-Onninen endpoint question for the centered maximal function, planar disk case: is ∥∇Mf∥1≤C∥∇f∥1\|\nabla Mf\|_1\le C\|\nabla f\|_1 on W1,1(R2)W^{1,1}(\mathbb R^2)? evidence for this event

This event attributed to Unreleased internal OpenAI model

Hajlasz and Onninen, On boundedness of maximal functions in Sobolev spaces (2004) evidence for this event

VibeMathed record: The Hajlasz-Onninen endpoint question for the centered maximal function, planar disk case: is ∥∇Mf∥1≤C∥∇f∥1\|\nabla Mf\|_1\le C\|\nabla f\|_1 on W1,1(R2)W^{1,1}(\mathbb R^2)? evidence for this event

Lean solution module: OAI/Analysis/DiskMaximal/Main.lean evidence for this event

Theorem 1.1: there is an absolute C<∞C<\infty such that for every real f∈W1,1(R2)f\in W^{1,1}(\mathbb R^2) the centered disk maximal function MfMf is locally integrable, lies in Wloc1,1(R2)W^{1,1}_{loc}(\mathbb R^2) and satisfies ∫∣∇Mf∣≤C∫∣∇f∣\int|\nabla Mf|\le C\int|\nabla f|. The key step is a signed finite-band estimate for sup⁡a≤t≤bAtg\sup_{a\le t\le b}A_tg uniform in the number of dyadic scales, combined with Lahti-Weigt's conditional regularity theorem. Not shown: dimensions n≥3n\ge3, balls in other norms, the BV (variation) version, the optimal constant, or continuity of f↦∇Mff\mapsto\nabla Mf. parent of this event

The Hajlasz-Onninen endpoint question for the centered maximal function, planar disk case: is ∥∇Mf∥1≤C∥∇f∥1\|\nabla Mf\|_1\le C\|\nabla f\|_1 on W1,1(R2)W^{1,1}(\mathbb R^2)? parent of this event

Act on this frontier

Verify, challenge, or extend the result.