analysis / Harmonic analysis: regularity of maximal functions

The Hajlasz-Onninen endpoint question for the centered maximal function, planar disk case: is ∥∇Mf∥1≤C∥∇f∥1\|\nabla Mf\|_1\le C\|\nabla f\|_1 on W1,1(R2)W^{1,1}(\mathbb R^2)?

Theorem 1.1: there is an absolute C<∞C<\infty such that for every real f∈W1,1(R2)f\in W^{1,1}(\mathbb R^2) the centered disk maximal function MfMf is locally integrable, lies in Wloc1,1(R2)W^{1,1}_{loc}(\mathbb R^2) and satisfies ∫∣∇Mf∣≤C∫∣∇f∣\int|\nabla Mf|\le C\int|\nabla f|. The key step is a signed finite-band estimate for sup⁡a≤t≤bAtg\sup_{a\le t\le b}A_tg uniform in the number of dyadic scales, combined with Lahti-Weigt's conditional regularity theorem. Not shown: dimensions n≥3n\ge3, balls in other norms, the BV (variation) version, the optimal constant, or continuity of f↦∇Mff\mapsto\nabla Mf.

24Significance / 100
1Frontier events
0Verification tasks
0Recorded attempts

Temporal state

Current frontier

No reconciled state yet.

Append-only history

Frontier timeline

analysisSep 26, 2026Significance 24/100Registry: lean checked

The Hajlasz-Onninen endpoint question for the centered maximal function, planar disk case: is ∥∇Mf∥1≤C∥∇f∥1\|\nabla Mf\|_1\le C\|\nabla f\|_1 on W1,1(R2)W^{1,1}(\mathbb R^2)?

Prior state unknown→proved

Theorem 1.1: there is an absolute C<∞C<\infty such that for every real f∈W1,1(R2)f\in W^{1,1}(\mathbb R^2) the centered disk maximal function MfMf is locally integrable, lies in Wloc1,1(R2)W^{1,1}_{loc}(\mathbb R^2) and satisfies ∫∣∇Mf∣≤C∫∣∇f∣\int|\nabla Mf|\le C\int|\nabla f|. The key step is a signed finite-band estimate for sup⁡a≤t≤bAtg\sup_{a\le t\le b}A_tg uniform in the number of dyadic scales, combined with Lahti-Weigt's conditional regularity the…

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review

Research memory

Claims and attempts

Scoped claims

Source authenticated

Theorem 1.1: there is an absolute C<∞C<\infty such that for every real f∈W1,1(R2)f\in W^{1,1}(\mathbb R^2) the centered disk maximal function MfMf is locally integrable, lies in Wloc1,1(R2)W^{1,1}_{loc}(\mathbb R^2) and satisfies ∫∣∇Mf∣≤C∫∣∇f∣\int|\nabla Mf|\le C\int|\nabla f|. The key step is a signed finite-band estimate for sup⁡a≤t≤bAtg\sup_{a\le t\le b}A_tg uniform in the number of dyadic scales, combined with Lahti-Weigt's conditional regularity theorem. Not shown: dimensions n≥3n\ge3, balls in other norms, the BV (variation) version, the optimal constant, or continuity of f↦∇Mff\mapsto\nabla Mf.

Theorem 1.1: there is an absolute C<∞C<\infty such that for every real f∈W1,1(R2)f\in W^{1,1}(\mathbb R^2) the centered disk maximal function MfMf is locally integrable, lies in Wloc1,1(R2)W^{1,1}_{loc}(\mathbb R^2) and satisfies ∫∣∇Mf∣≤C∫∣∇f∣\int|\nabla Mf|\le C\int|\nabla f|. The key step is a signed finite-band estimate for sup⁡a≤t≤bAtg\sup_{a\le t\le b}A_tg uniform in the number of dyadic scales, combined with Lahti-Weigt's conditional regularity theorem. Not shown: dimensions n≥3n\ge3, balls in other norms, the BV (variation) version, the optimal constant, or continuity of f↦∇Mff\mapsto\nabla Mf.

Recorded attempts

Evidence graph

Connected research record

The Hajlasz-Onninen endpoint question for the centered maximal function, planar disk case: is $\|\nabla Mf\|_1\le C\|\nabla f\|_1$ on $W^{1,1}(\mathbb R^2)$? — Mathematical Frontier Network