Source authenticated

The (2,1)(2,1)-Gapped Consecutive-Ones Property Problem is NP-complete

The manuscript claims a polynomial-time reduction from 3-SAT proving (2,1)(2,1)-C1P NP-hard; together with membership in NP, this establishes NP-completeness and closes the sole unresolved (k,δ)(k,\delta) case from the earlier classification. It also implies NP-completeness of the equivalent completion problem. The proof package further shows that, within its specific nested-prefix/internal-local gadget architecture, no 3-OR gadget exists with at most six internal columns; at seven columns at least three local rows are required, and all optimal three-row gadgets form one symmetry class. These optimality claims are architecture-specific and are not needed for the NP-completeness result. Independent verification remains pending.

Exact FrontierDelta

Prior state unknown→proved

Scope and record

Occurred: Aug 12, 2026

Delta type: SOURCE CLAIM

Assumptions: VibeMathed verification: unreviewed. Publication: preprint. AI contribution: ai-discovered. Editorial metadata: CC BY 4.0; linked content retains its own rights.

Canonical aliases: The $(2,1)$-Gapped Consecutive-Ones Property Problem is NP-complete · $(2,1)$-C1P is NP-complete

Confidence: Not scored

Registry verification: unreviewed · preprint · candidate

Open the source record ↗

Attribution

VibeMathed
registry · event recorded by

Maciej Nowicki
human · human collaborator

GPT-5.6 Sol High
model · ai model contributor · OpenAI

Lineage and corrections

This event attributed to Maciej Nowicki

This event attributed to GPT-5.6 Sol High

The (2,1)(2,1)-Gapped Consecutive-Ones Property Problem is NP-complete evidence for this event

Original 2009 hardness paper leaving (2,1)(2,1)-C1P open evidence for this event

2011 follow-up explicitly stating that (2,1)(2,1)-C1P remains open evidence for this event

The manuscript claims a polynomial-time reduction from 3-SAT proving (2,1)(2,1)-C1P NP-hard; together with membership in NP, this establishes NP-completeness and closes the sole unresolved (k,δ)(k,\delta) case from the earlier classification. It also implies NP-completeness of the equivalent completion problem. The proof package further shows that, within its specific nested-prefix/internal-local gadget architecture, no 3-OR gadget exists with at most six internal columns; at seven columns at least three local rows are required, and all optimal three-row gadgets form one symmetry class. These optimality claims are architecture-specific and are not needed for the NP-completeness result. Independent verification remains pending. parent of this event

The (2,1)(2,1)-Gapped Consecutive-Ones Property Problem is NP-complete parent of this event

Initial Zenodo record announcing the NP-completeness proof evidence for this event

VibeMathed record: The (2,1)(2,1)-Gapped Consecutive-Ones Property Problem is NP-complete evidence for this event

Act on this frontier

Verify, challenge, or extend the result.