theoretical-computer-science / Computational complexity / consecutive-ones property

The (2,1)(2,1)-Gapped Consecutive-Ones Property Problem is NP-complete

The manuscript claims a polynomial-time reduction from 3-SAT proving (2,1)(2,1)-C1P NP-hard; together with membership in NP, this establishes NP-completeness and closes the sole unresolved (k,δ)(k,\delta) case from the earlier classification. It also implies NP-completeness of the equivalent completion problem. The proof package further shows that, within its specific nested-prefix/internal-local gadget architecture, no 3-OR gadget exists with at most six internal columns; at seven columns at least three local rows are required, and all optimal three-row gadgets form one symmetry class. These optimality claims are architecture-specific and are not needed for the NP-completeness result. Independent verification remains pending.

12Significance / 100
1Frontier events
0Verification tasks
0Recorded attempts

Temporal state

Current frontier

No reconciled state yet.

Append-only history

Frontier timeline

theoretical-computer-scienceAug 12, 2026Significance 12/100Registry: unreviewed

The (2,1)(2,1)-Gapped Consecutive-Ones Property Problem is NP-complete

Prior state unknown→proved

The manuscript claims a polynomial-time reduction from 3-SAT proving (2,1)(2,1)-C1P NP-hard; together with membership in NP, this establishes NP-completeness and closes the sole unresolved (k,δ)(k,\delta) case from the earlier classification. It also implies NP-completeness of the equivalent completion problem. The proof package further shows that, within its specific nested-prefix/internal-local gadget architecture, no…

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review

Research memory

Claims and attempts

Scoped claims

Source authenticated

The manuscript claims a polynomial-time reduction from 3-SAT proving (2,1)(2,1)-C1P NP-hard; together with membership in NP, this establishes NP-completeness and closes the sole unresolved (k,δ)(k,\delta) case from the earlier classification. It also implies NP-completeness of the equivalent completion problem. The proof package further shows that, within its specific nested-prefix/internal-local gadget architecture, no 3-OR gadget exists with at most six internal columns; at seven columns at least three local rows are required, and all optimal three-row gadgets form one symmetry class. These optimality claims are architecture-specific and are not needed for the NP-completeness result. Independent verification remains pending.

The manuscript claims a polynomial-time reduction from 3-SAT proving (2,1)(2,1)-C1P NP-hard; together with membership in NP, this establishes NP-completeness and closes the sole unresolved (k,δ)(k,\delta) case from the earlier classification. It also implies NP-completeness of the equivalent completion problem. The proof package further shows that, within its specific nested-prefix/internal-local gadget architecture, no 3-OR gadget exists with at most six internal columns; at seven columns at least three local rows are required, and all optimal three-row gadgets form one symmetry class. These optimality claims are architecture-specific and are not needed for the NP-completeness result. Independent verification remains pending.

Recorded attempts

Evidence graph

Connected research record