quantum-information-computing / Quantum complexity theory

A Quantum Oracle Separation Between QMA(2)\mathsf{QMA}(2) and QMA\mathsf{QMA}

The authors construct a unitary oracle UU such that QMAUQMA(2)U. \mathsf{QMA}^{U}\neq\mathsf{QMA}(2)^{U}. Their black-box problem is solvable by a QMA(2)\mathsf{QMA}(2) verifier with one oracle query and linear-size unentangled proofs, whereas any QMA\mathsf{QMA} verifier must use either exponentially many queries or an exponentially large witness. As a non-oracle consequence, they prove that for every fixed ε,δ0\varepsilon,\delta\ge 0 with ε+δ<1\varepsilon+\delta<1, any (ε,δ)(\varepsilon,\delta)-disentangler requires exponentially many input qubits in the number of output qubits, resolving Watrous's no-disentanglers conjecture.

36Significance / 100
1Frontier events
0Verification tasks
0Recorded attempts

Temporal state

Current frontier

No reconciled state yet.

Append-only history

Frontier timeline

quantum-information-computingSep 2, 2026Significance 36/100Registry: unreviewed

A Quantum Oracle Separation Between QMA(2)\mathsf{QMA}(2) and QMA\mathsf{QMA}

Prior state unknownproved

The authors construct a unitary oracle UU such that QMAUQMA(2)U. \mathsf{QMA}^{U}\neq\mathsf{QMA}(2)^{U}. Their black-box problem is solvable by a QMA(2)\mathsf{QMA}(2) verifier with one oracle query and linear-size unentangled proofs, whereas any QMA\mathsf{QMA} verifier must use either exponentially many queries or an exponentially large witness. As a non-oracle consequence, they prove that for every fixed…

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review

Research memory

Claims and attempts

Scoped claims

Source authenticated

The authors construct a unitary oracle UU such that QMAUQMA(2)U. \mathsf{QMA}^{U}\neq\mathsf{QMA}(2)^{U}. Their black-box problem is solvable by a QMA(2)\mathsf{QMA}(2) verifier with one oracle query and linear-size unentangled proofs, whereas any QMA\mathsf{QMA} verifier must use either exponentially many queries or an exponentially large witness. As a non-oracle consequence, they prove that for every fixed ε,δ0\varepsilon,\delta\ge 0 with ε+δ<1\varepsilon+\delta<1, any (ε,δ)(\varepsilon,\delta)-disentangler requires exponentially many input qubits in the number of output qubits, resolving Watrous's no-disentanglers conjecture.

The authors construct a unitary oracle UU such that QMAUQMA(2)U. \mathsf{QMA}^{U}\neq\mathsf{QMA}(2)^{U}. Their black-box problem is solvable by a QMA(2)\mathsf{QMA}(2) verifier with one oracle query and linear-size unentangled proofs, whereas any QMA\mathsf{QMA} verifier must use either exponentially many queries or an exponentially large witness. As a non-oracle consequence, they prove that for every fixed ε,δ0\varepsilon,\delta\ge 0 with ε+δ<1\varepsilon+\delta<1, any (ε,δ)(\varepsilon,\delta)-disentangler requires exponentially many input qubits in the number of output qubits, resolving Watrous's no-disentanglers conjecture.

Recorded attempts

Evidence graph

Connected research record