probability-statistics / Statistics

Universal Multiplicative FDR Bound for Benjamini-Hochberg

The Benjamini-Hochberg procedure is known not to control the false discovery rate at its nominal level under arbitrary dependence. A folklore conjecture in the FDR literature held that it must at least control the FDR up to a universal multiplicative constant. It does not: there are finite Gaussian models whose FDR divided by $q$ diverges as $q \downarrow 0$, with an explicit two-sided lower bound $q\sqrt{\log(1/q)}/(2\sqrt{\pi}) + 0.6493 q + o(q)$.

30Significance / 100
1Frontier events
0Verification tasks
0Recorded attempts

Temporal state

Current frontier

No reconciled state yet.

Append-only history

Frontier timeline

probability-statisticsJul 20, 2026Significance 30/100Registry: unreviewed

Universal Multiplicative FDR Bound for Benjamini-Hochberg

Prior state unknowndisproved

The Benjamini-Hochberg procedure is known not to control the false discovery rate at its nominal level under arbitrary dependence. A folklore conjecture in the FDR literature held that it must at least control the FDR up to a universal multiplicative constant. It does not: there are finite Gaussian models whose FDR divided by $q$ diverges as $q \downarrow 0$, with an explicit two-sided lower bound $q\sqrt{\log(1/q…

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review

Research memory

Claims and attempts

Scoped claims

Source authenticated

The Benjamini-Hochberg procedure is known not to control the false discovery rate at its nominal level under arbitrary dependence. A folklore conjecture in the FDR literature held that it must at least control the FDR up to a universal multiplicative constant. It does not: there are finite Gaussian models whose FDR divided by $q$ diverges as $q \downarrow 0$, with an explicit two-sided lower bound $q\sqrt{\log(1/q)}/(2\sqrt{\pi}) + 0.6493 q + o(q)$.

Recorded attempts

Evidence graph

Connected research record

No public relationships recorded yet.