Source authenticatedThe preprint claims an exact classification. Write C5(G) for the residues modulo five represented by cycle lengths in G. Let
E5=K6,K5,5∪H5,n;t:2≤t≤5<n,
where H5,n;t is obtained from K5,n by deleting 5−t edges incident with one vertex in the part of size n.
For every finite simple graph G with minimum degree at least five, exactly one alternative holds: C5(G)=Z5; or every end-block belongs to E5 and every non-end-block contains no cycle of length congruent to two modulo five. Every member of E5 has cycle-residue spectrum 0,1,3,4.
The proof combines structural arguments with finite computational checks. It uses the separately established Dean–5 theorem and its weak-graph strengthening as inputs. The contribution is the stronger stability classification; independent expert review remains pending.
The preprint claims an exact classification. Write C5(G) for the residues modulo five represented by cycle lengths in G. Let
E5=K6,K5,5∪H5,n;t:2≤t≤5<n,
where H5,n;t is obtained from K5,n by deleting 5−t edges incident with one vertex in the part of size n.
For every finite simple graph G with minimum degree at least five, exactly one alternative holds: C5(G)=Z5; or every end-block belongs to E5 and every non-end-block contains no cycle of length congruent to two modulo five. Every member of E5 has cycle-residue spectrum 0,1,3,4.
The proof combines structural arguments with finite computational checks. It uses the separately established Dean–5 theorem and its weak-graph strengthening as inputs. The contribution is the stronger stability classification; independent expert review remains pending.