combinatorics / Extremal set theory

The Daykin–Frankl conjecture on convex subsets of the Boolean lattice

Let P⊆QnP\subseteq Q_n be convex. Williams proves the stronger statement that for every k≥0k\ge0, w(P×Qk)≥w(Qn+k) ∣P∣ 2−n, w(P\times Q_k) \ge w(Q_{n+k})\,|P|\,2^{-n}, where ww denotes poset width. Taking k=0k=0 gives w(P)≥∣P∣(n⌊n/2⌋)2−n, w(P)\ge |P|\binom{n}{\lfloor n/2\rfloor}2^{-n}, which is exactly the Daykin-Frankl conjecture. The proof proceeds by induction on nn, reducing the step to a structural lemma for a convex subset of R×Q1R\times Q_1 and carefully recombining antichains from its two layers.

25Significance / 100
1Frontier events
0Verification tasks
0Recorded attempts

Temporal state

Current frontier

No reconciled state yet.

Append-only history

Frontier timeline

combinatoricsSep 2, 2026Significance 25/100Registry: unreviewed

The Daykin–Frankl conjecture on convex subsets of the Boolean lattice

Prior state unknown→proved

Let P⊆QnP\subseteq Q_n be convex. Williams proves the stronger statement that for every k≥0k\ge0, w(P×Qk)≥w(Qn+k) ∣P∣ 2−n, w(P\times Q_k) \ge w(Q_{n+k})\,|P|\,2^{-n}, where ww denotes poset width. Taking k=0k=0 gives w(P)≥∣P∣(n⌊n/2⌋)2−n, w(P)\ge |P|\binom{n}{\lfloor n/2\rfloor}2^{-n}, which is exactly the Daykin-Frankl conjecture. The proof proceeds by induction on nn, reducing the step to a structural lemma for a convex subset of R×Q1R\times Q_1 and…

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review

Research memory

Claims and attempts

Scoped claims

Source authenticated

Let P⊆QnP\subseteq Q_n be convex. Williams proves the stronger statement that for every k≥0k\ge0, w(P×Qk)≥w(Qn+k) ∣P∣ 2−n, w(P\times Q_k) \ge w(Q_{n+k})\,|P|\,2^{-n}, where ww denotes poset width. Taking k=0k=0 gives w(P)≥∣P∣(n⌊n/2⌋)2−n, w(P)\ge |P|\binom{n}{\lfloor n/2\rfloor}2^{-n}, which is exactly the Daykin-Frankl conjecture. The proof proceeds by induction on nn, reducing the step to a structural lemma for a convex subset of R×Q1R\times Q_1 and carefully recombining antichains from its two layers.

Let P⊆QnP\subseteq Q_n be convex. Williams proves the stronger statement that for every k≥0k\ge0, w(P×Qk)≥w(Qn+k) ∣P∣ 2−n, w(P\times Q_k) \ge w(Q_{n+k})\,|P|\,2^{-n}, where ww denotes poset width. Taking k=0k=0 gives w(P)≥∣P∣(n⌊n/2⌋)2−n, w(P)\ge |P|\binom{n}{\lfloor n/2\rfloor}2^{-n}, which is exactly the Daykin-Frankl conjecture. The proof proceeds by induction on nn, reducing the step to a structural lemma for a convex subset of R×Q1R\times Q_1 and carefully recombining antichains from its two layers.

Recorded attempts

Evidence graph

Connected research record

The Daykin–Frankl conjecture on convex subsets of the Boolean lattice — Mathematical Frontier Network