combinatorics / Permutational Ramsey theory

Dihedral Ramsey numbers of the alternating a-path versus K_b, for every a >= 4: 1 + (a-1)(b-1)

The dihedral case only, for every a≥4a \ge 4 and b≥1b \ge 1; the substance is the upper bound, which the source paper's own computations could not reach. Together with the sibling a = 3 entry this proves Conjecture 4.9's claim 1+(a−1)(b−1)1+(a-1)(b-1) for all a≥3a \ge 3; the conjecture's trivial a = 1, 2 cases are unaddressed by either entry, and the cyclic analogue Rcyc(Paalt,Kb)R_{cyc}(P_a^{alt}, K_b) for a≥4a \ge 4 remains open. The engine is a self-contained inequality of independent interest: for any graph on a linearly ordered vertex set, the alternating-path reach statistics satisfy ∑m[P(m)+Q(m)]≥2∣E(G)∣\sum_m [P(m)+Q(m)] \ge 2|E(G)|, from which the theorem falls out by averaging and a pivot decomposition.

8Significance / 100
1Frontier events
0Verification tasks
0Recorded attempts

Temporal state

Current frontier

No reconciled state yet.

Append-only history

Frontier timeline

combinatoricsAug 13, 2026Significance 8/100Registry: site confirmed

Dihedral Ramsey numbers of the alternating a-path versus K_b, for every a >= 4: 1 + (a-1)(b-1)

Prior state unknown→proved

The dihedral case only, for every a≥4a \ge 4 and b≥1b \ge 1; the substance is the upper bound, which the source paper's own computations could not reach. Together with the sibling a = 3 entry this proves Conjecture 4.9's claim 1+(a−1)(b−1)1+(a-1)(b-1) for all a≥3a \ge 3; the conjecture's trivial a = 1, 2 cases are unaddressed by either entry, and the cyclic analogue Rcyc(Paalt,Kb)R_{cyc}(P_a^{alt}, K_b) for a≥4a \ge 4 remains open. The engin…

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review

Research memory

Claims and attempts

Scoped claims

Source authenticated

The dihedral case only, for every a≥4a \ge 4 and b≥1b \ge 1; the substance is the upper bound, which the source paper's own computations could not reach. Together with the sibling a = 3 entry this proves Conjecture 4.9's claim 1+(a−1)(b−1)1+(a-1)(b-1) for all a≥3a \ge 3; the conjecture's trivial a = 1, 2 cases are unaddressed by either entry, and the cyclic analogue Rcyc(Paalt,Kb)R_{cyc}(P_a^{alt}, K_b) for a≥4a \ge 4 remains open. The engine is a self-contained inequality of independent interest: for any graph on a linearly ordered vertex set, the alternating-path reach statistics satisfy ∑m[P(m)+Q(m)]≥2∣E(G)∣\sum_m [P(m)+Q(m)] \ge 2|E(G)|, from which the theorem falls out by averaging and a pivot decomposition.

The dihedral case only, for every a≥4a \ge 4 and b≥1b \ge 1; the substance is the upper bound, which the source paper's own computations could not reach. Together with the sibling a = 3 entry this proves Conjecture 4.9's claim 1+(a−1)(b−1)1+(a-1)(b-1) for all a≥3a \ge 3; the conjecture's trivial a = 1, 2 cases are unaddressed by either entry, and the cyclic analogue Rcyc(Paalt,Kb)R_{cyc}(P_a^{alt}, K_b) for a≥4a \ge 4 remains open. The engine is a self-contained inequality of independent interest: for any graph on a linearly ordered vertex set, the alternating-path reach statistics satisfy ∑m[P(m)+Q(m)]≥2∣E(G)∣\sum_m [P(m)+Q(m)] \ge 2|E(G)|, from which the theorem falls out by averaging and a pivot decomposition.

Recorded attempts

Evidence graph

Connected research record