algebra / Birational geometry; pluricanonical systems

The effective Iitaka fibration conjecture

Theorem 1.1: for each d≥1d\ge1 there is m(d)>0m(d)>0 such that, over every algebraically closed field of characteristic zero, ∣m(d)KX∣|m(d)K_X| is nonempty and its section ratios generate the Iitaka function field for every smooth integral projective dd-fold with κ(X)≥0\kappa(X)\ge0; every multiple of m(d)m(d) works too. Theorem 1.2 gives a uniform a(d,Φ)a(d,\Phi) with a(KX+B)∼0a(K_X+B)\sim0 for projective lc pairs with KX+B∼Q0K_X+B\sim_{\mathbb Q}0 and coefficients in a DCC set Φ\Phi. The bound m(d)m(d) is existential; no explicit value is given.

32Significance / 100
1Frontier events
0Verification tasks
0Recorded attempts

Temporal state

Current frontier

No reconciled state yet.

Append-only history

Frontier timeline

algebraOct 3, 2026Significance 32/100Registry: contested

The effective Iitaka fibration conjecture

Prior state unknown→proved

Theorem 1.1: for each d≥1d\ge1 there is m(d)>0m(d)>0 such that, over every algebraically closed field of characteristic zero, ∣m(d)KX∣|m(d)K_X| is nonempty and its section ratios generate the Iitaka function field for every smooth integral projective dd-fold with κ(X)≥0\kappa(X)\ge0; every multiple of m(d)m(d) works too. Theorem 1.2 gives a uniform a(d,Φ)a(d,\Phi) with a(KX+B)∼0a(K_X+B)\sim0 for projective lc pairs with…

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review! Disputed

Research memory

Claims and attempts

Scoped claims

Disputed

Theorem 1.1: for each d≥1d\ge1 there is m(d)>0m(d)>0 such that, over every algebraically closed field of characteristic zero, ∣m(d)KX∣|m(d)K_X| is nonempty and its section ratios generate the Iitaka function field for every smooth integral projective dd-fold with κ(X)≥0\kappa(X)\ge0; every multiple of m(d)m(d) works too. Theorem 1.2 gives a uniform a(d,Φ)a(d,\Phi) with a(KX+B)∼0a(K_X+B)\sim0 for projective lc pairs with KX+B∼Q0K_X+B\sim_{\mathbb Q}0 and coefficients in a DCC set Φ\Phi. The bound m(d)m(d) is existential; no explicit value is given.

This result uses the release's log abundance theorem as an input, and the release contradicts itself on whether that theorem is unconditional (24 September abstract) or a conditional resolution resting on logarithmic Iitaka subadditivity (5 October appendix). The entry is Contested with it. Theorem 1.1: for each d≥1d\ge1 there is m(d)>0m(d)>0 such that, over every algebraically closed field of characteristic zero, ∣m(d)KX∣|m(d)K_X| is nonempty and its section ratios generate the Iitaka function field for every smooth integral projective dd-fold with κ(X)≥0\kappa(X)\ge0; every multiple of m(d)m(d) works too. Theorem 1.2 gives a uniform a(d,Φ)a(d,\Phi) with a(KX+B)∼0a(K_X+B)\sim0 for projective lc pairs with KX+B∼Q0K_X+B\sim_{\mathbb Q}0 and coefficients in a DCC set Φ\Phi. The bound m(d)m(d) is existential; no explicit value is given.

Recorded attempts

Evidence graph

Connected research record