combinatorics / Set Theory, Infinite Combinatorics

Erdős Problem #623

Let $X$ be a set of cardinality $\aleph_\omega$ and $f$ a function from the finite subsets of $X$ to $X$ such that $f(A)\not\in A$ for all $A$. Must there exist an infinite independent $Y\subseteq X$, i.e. with $f(B)\not\in Y$ for all finite $B\subset Y$? Claimed resolution: the positive assertion is equivalent to Koepke's free-subset property, hence independent of ZFC, with consistency strength exactly a measurable cardinal.

10Significance / 100
1Frontier events
0Verification tasks
0Recorded attempts

Temporal state

Current frontier

No reconciled state yet.

Append-only history

Frontier timeline

combinatoricsJun 4, 2026Significance 10/100Registry: unreviewed

Erdős Problem #623

Prior state unknownproved

Resolved (if correct) by an independence result rather than a proof or disproof in ZFC: consistency of the positive answer is equivalent to a measurable cardinal, of the negative to ZFC alone

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review

Research memory

Claims and attempts

Scoped claims

Source authenticated

Let $X$ be a set of cardinality $\aleph_\omega$ and $f$ a function from the finite subsets of $X$ to $X$ such that $f(A)\not\in A$ for all $A$. Must there exist an infinite independent $Y\subseteq X$, i.e. with $f(B)\not\in Y$ for all finite $B\subset Y$? Claimed resolution: the positive assertion is equivalent to Koepke's free-subset property, hence independent of ZFC, with consistency strength exactly a measurable cardinal.

Resolved (if correct) by an independence result rather than a proof or disproof in ZFC: consistency of the positive answer is equivalent to a measurable cardinal, of the negative to ZFC alone

Recorded attempts

Evidence graph

Connected research record

No public relationships recorded yet.