The higher-dimensional Erdos distinct-distances conjecture
Theorem 1.1: for every integer d≥3 there is cd>0 such that every set of n≥2 distinct points in Rd determines at least cdn2/d distinct distances, matching the integer grid up to the constant. No dependence of cd on d is made explicit, nothing is claimed for pinned distances (many distances from one point), and the planar problem, whose conjectured order is n/logn, is untouched beyond reusing the Guth-Katz bound. Priority: Aksoy Yazici earlier claimed the same constant-factor bound in all dimensions d≥3, but withdrew the manuscript because a step was wrong; it is not an opposite claim.
Theorem 1.1: for every integer d≥3 there is cd>0 such that every set of n≥2 distinct points in Rd determines at least cdn2/d distinct distances, matching the integer grid up to the constant. No dependence of cd on d is made explicit, nothing is claimed for pinned distances (many distances from one point), and the planar problem, whose conjectured order is n/logn, is untouc…
Theorem 1.1: for every integer d≥3 there is cd>0 such that every set of n≥2 distinct points in Rd determines at least cdn2/d distinct distances, matching the integer grid up to the constant. No dependence of cd on d is made explicit, nothing is claimed for pinned distances (many distances from one point), and the planar problem, whose conjectured order is n/logn, is untouched beyond reusing the Guth-Katz bound. Priority: Aksoy Yazici earlier claimed the same constant-factor bound in all dimensions d≥3, but withdrew the manuscript because a step was wrong; it is not an opposite claim.
Theorem 1.1: for every integer d≥3 there is cd>0 such that every set of n≥2 distinct points in Rd determines at least cdn2/d distinct distances, matching the integer grid up to the constant. No dependence of cd on d is made explicit, nothing is claimed for pinned distances (many distances from one point), and the planar problem, whose conjectured order is n/logn, is untouched beyond reusing the Guth-Katz bound. Priority: Aksoy Yazici earlier claimed the same constant-factor bound in all dimensions d≥3, but withdrew the manuscript because a step was wrong; it is not an opposite claim.