algebra / Representation theory; Chow varieties and geometric complexity theory

Landsberg's Problem 7.19: a polynomial stabilization bound for the canonical Foulkes-Howe map

Theorem 1: for every a≥2a\ge2, b≥a(a−1)b\ge a(a-1) and finite-dimensional complex VV, μa,b,V\mu_{a,b,V} is surjective; equivalently the Chow-variety coordinate ring agrees with its normalization in degree bb. In Landsberg's notation the bound is d≥n(n−1)d\ge n(n-1), in every dimension. By complete reducibility this yields Foulkes' embedding Syma(SymbV)↪Symb(SymaV)\mathrm{Sym}^a(\mathrm{Sym}^bV)\hookrightarrow\mathrm{Sym}^b(\mathrm{Sym}^aV) for b≥a(a−1)b\ge a(a-1). The least stabilization degree is not determined, the bound is not claimed sharp, and nothing is said about injectivity of the map in the other direction (which fails at (5,5)(5,5) and (6,6)(6,6)).

17Significance / 100
1Frontier events
0Verification tasks
0Recorded attempts

Temporal state

Current frontier

No reconciled state yet.

Append-only history

Frontier timeline

algebraSep 25, 2026Significance 17/100Registry: lean checked

Landsberg's Problem 7.19: a polynomial stabilization bound for the canonical Foulkes-Howe map

Prior state unknown→proved

Theorem 1: for every a≥2a\ge2, b≥a(a−1)b\ge a(a-1) and finite-dimensional complex VV, μa,b,V\mu_{a,b,V} is surjective; equivalently the Chow-variety coordinate ring agrees with its normalization in degree bb. In Landsberg's notation the bound is d≥n(n−1)d\ge n(n-1), in every dimension. By complete reducibility this yields Foulkes' embedding Syma(SymbV)↪Symb(SymaV)\mathrm{Sym}^a(\mathrm{Sym}^bV)\hookrightarrow\mathrm{Sym}^b(\mathrm{Sym}^aV) for…

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review

Research memory

Claims and attempts

Scoped claims

Source authenticated

Theorem 1: for every a≥2a\ge2, b≥a(a−1)b\ge a(a-1) and finite-dimensional complex VV, μa,b,V\mu_{a,b,V} is surjective; equivalently the Chow-variety coordinate ring agrees with its normalization in degree bb. In Landsberg's notation the bound is d≥n(n−1)d\ge n(n-1), in every dimension. By complete reducibility this yields Foulkes' embedding Syma(SymbV)↪Symb(SymaV)\mathrm{Sym}^a(\mathrm{Sym}^bV)\hookrightarrow\mathrm{Sym}^b(\mathrm{Sym}^aV) for b≥a(a−1)b\ge a(a-1). The least stabilization degree is not determined, the bound is not claimed sharp, and nothing is said about injectivity of the map in the other direction (which fails at (5,5)(5,5) and (6,6)(6,6)).

Theorem 1: for every a≥2a\ge2, b≥a(a−1)b\ge a(a-1) and finite-dimensional complex VV, μa,b,V\mu_{a,b,V} is surjective; equivalently the Chow-variety coordinate ring agrees with its normalization in degree bb. In Landsberg's notation the bound is d≥n(n−1)d\ge n(n-1), in every dimension. By complete reducibility this yields Foulkes' embedding Syma(SymbV)↪Symb(SymaV)\mathrm{Sym}^a(\mathrm{Sym}^bV)\hookrightarrow\mathrm{Sym}^b(\mathrm{Sym}^aV) for b≥a(a−1)b\ge a(a-1). The least stabilization degree is not determined, the bound is not claimed sharp, and nothing is said about injectivity of the map in the other direction (which fails at (5,5)(5,5) and (6,6)(6,6)).

Recorded attempts

Evidence graph

Connected research record