mathematical-physics

Full-RSB in the Sherrington–Kirkpatrick spin glass

This work proves full replica symmetry breaking for the zero-field Sherrington–Kirkpatrick model at zero temperature $\beta=\infty$: the Parisi minimizer is absolutely continuous, has a smooth density, and has support $[0,1)$, thereby confirming the prediction by Parisi.

35Significance / 100
1Frontier events
0Verification tasks
0Recorded attempts

Temporal state

Current frontier

No reconciled state yet.

Append-only history

Frontier timeline

mathematical-physicsJul 20, 2026Significance 35/100Registry: unreviewed

Full-RSB in the Sherrington–Kirkpatrick spin glass

Prior state unknownproved

For the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick model with no external field, at zero temperature $\beta=\infty$, the paper proves that the zero-temperature Parisi minimizer is absolutely continuous with a smooth density and has support $[0,1)$ - full replica symmetry breaking, confirming the Parisi picture at the ground state. It also shows $q_\beta\to1$ as $\beta\to\infty$. The positive-temperature input is Lopatto's: for ever…

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review

Research memory

Claims and attempts

Scoped claims

Source authenticated

This work proves full replica symmetry breaking for the zero-field Sherrington–Kirkpatrick model at zero temperature $\beta=\infty$: the Parisi minimizer is absolutely continuous, has a smooth density, and has support $[0,1)$, thereby confirming the prediction by Parisi.

For the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick model with no external field, at zero temperature $\beta=\infty$, the paper proves that the zero-temperature Parisi minimizer is absolutely continuous with a smooth density and has support $[0,1)$ - full replica symmetry breaking, confirming the Parisi picture at the ground state. It also shows $q_\beta\to1$ as $\beta\to\infty$. The positive-temperature input is Lopatto's: for every $\beta>1$ the Parisi measure is supported on the closed interval $[0,q_\beta]$, with a smooth density on $[0,q_\beta)$ and a single atom at the right endpoint $q_\beta$. That endpoint atom is what the paper's own quantitative estimates target, so it is not incidental. This entry is cited as Theorem 1.1 rather than reproved. Remark 1.4 is worth reading beside the support claim: the half-open interval is essential, because the zero-temperature functional cannot see an endpoint atom at all, so there is no canonical mass there to converge to.

Recorded attempts

Evidence graph

Connected research record

No public relationships recorded yet.