Source authenticatedTheorem 1.1: let A=F(a,b1,…,b99), w=ab1ab2⋯ab99a, J=⟨b1,…,b99,w⟩ and Γ=A∗J(J×⟨t⟩). With K=e969699/9595, 0<α<1/200, Kα3<1/2 and η=α/100, the free part of the Bernoulli action on [0,1]Γ has cost at least 1+η, while the skew action on X×Z/M via χ(a)=1, χ(bi)=χ(t)=0 has cost at most 1+99/M. Taking M>max{100,99/η} gives two essentially free p.m.p. actions of one finitely generated group with different costs. It does not address the fixed-price-one question for groups with property (T), the fixed price of any specific classical group, or the rank-gradient consequences of fixed price.
Theorem 1.1: let A=F(a,b1,…,b99), w=ab1ab2⋯ab99a, J=⟨b1,…,b99,w⟩ and Γ=A∗J(J×⟨t⟩). With K=e969699/9595, 0<α<1/200, Kα3<1/2 and η=α/100, the free part of the Bernoulli action on [0,1]Γ has cost at least 1+η, while the skew action on X×Z/M via χ(a)=1, χ(bi)=χ(t)=0 has cost at most 1+99/M. Taking M>max{100,99/η} gives two essentially free p.m.p. actions of one finitely generated group with different costs. It does not address the fixed-price-one question for groups with property (T), the fixed price of any specific classical group, or the rank-gradient consequences of fixed price.