combinatorics / Graph polynomials

The Integer Domination Root Conjecture

Akbari, Alikhani, Oboudi and Peng conjectured in 2010 that 0 and -2 are the only integer roots of the domination polynomial $D(G, x)$, proven for trees and unicyclic graphs and verified exhaustively for small orders. The paper gives a counterexample of order 33 with an integer domination root at $x = -4$, built from an S-unit branch cancellation mechanism.

11Significance / 100
1Frontier events
0Verification tasks
0Recorded attempts

Temporal state

Current frontier

No reconciled state yet.

Append-only history

Frontier timeline

combinatoricsJul 31, 2026Significance 11/100Registry: unreviewed

The Integer Domination Root Conjecture

Prior state unknowndisproved

Akbari, Alikhani, Oboudi and Peng conjectured in 2010 that 0 and -2 are the only integer roots of the domination polynomial $D(G, x)$, proven for trees and unicyclic graphs and verified exhaustively for small orders. The paper gives a counterexample of order 33 with an integer domination root at $x = -4$, built from an S-unit branch cancellation mechanism.

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review

Research memory

Claims and attempts

Scoped claims

Source authenticated

Akbari, Alikhani, Oboudi and Peng conjectured in 2010 that 0 and -2 are the only integer roots of the domination polynomial $D(G, x)$, proven for trees and unicyclic graphs and verified exhaustively for small orders. The paper gives a counterexample of order 33 with an integer domination root at $x = -4$, built from an S-unit branch cancellation mechanism.

Recorded attempts

Evidence graph

Connected research record

No public relationships recorded yet.