analysis / Operator algebras; traces and quasitraces on C*-algebras

Kaplansky's quasitrace problem: is every 2-quasitrace on a unital C*-algebra a trace?

Theorem 1.1: there are a separable unital C∗C^*-algebra A=M48(B)A=M_{48}(B) with a normalized 2-quasitrace and positive contractions a,ba,b with τ(a+b)−τ(a)−τ(b)≥1/144\tau(a+b)-\tau(a)-\tau(b)\ge1/144 for every normalized 2-quasitrace τ\tau, so none is a trace. BB is generated by 24 shifts between vector bundles with ∑xi∗xi=1\sum x_i^*x_i=1 and ∑xixi∗≤23\sum x_ix_i^*\le\frac23, Chern-class obstructions ruling out proper infiniteness in every matrix size. Hence a type II1_1 AW∗AW^*-factor that is not a von Neumann algebra exists. Corollary: two unital simple stably finite algebras, one Cr∗(F2)C_r^*(\mathbb F_2), with properly infinite minimal tensor product (answering Milhoj-Rordam Question 2.5), and a separable stably finite algebra with no tracial state. Not shown: a simple or exact example (exact is impossible by Haagerup), or an explicit II1_1 factor.

55Significance / 100
1Frontier events
0Verification tasks
0Recorded attempts

Temporal state

Current frontier

No reconciled state yet.

Append-only history

Frontier timeline

analysisSep 23, 2026Significance 55/100Registry: lean checked

Kaplansky's quasitrace problem: is every 2-quasitrace on a unital C*-algebra a trace?

Prior state unknown→disproved

Theorem 1.1: there are a separable unital C∗C^*-algebra A=M48(B)A=M_{48}(B) with a normalized 2-quasitrace and positive contractions a,ba,b with τ(a+b)−τ(a)−τ(b)≥1/144\tau(a+b)-\tau(a)-\tau(b)\ge1/144 for every normalized 2-quasitrace τ\tau, so none is a trace. BB is generated by 24 shifts between vector bundles with ∑xi∗xi=1\sum x_i^*x_i=1 and ∑xixi∗≤23\sum x_ix_i^*\le\frac23, Chern-class obstructions ruling out proper infiniteness in every matrix size…

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review

Research memory

Claims and attempts

Scoped claims

Source authenticated

Theorem 1.1: there are a separable unital C∗C^*-algebra A=M48(B)A=M_{48}(B) with a normalized 2-quasitrace and positive contractions a,ba,b with τ(a+b)−τ(a)−τ(b)≥1/144\tau(a+b)-\tau(a)-\tau(b)\ge1/144 for every normalized 2-quasitrace τ\tau, so none is a trace. BB is generated by 24 shifts between vector bundles with ∑xi∗xi=1\sum x_i^*x_i=1 and ∑xixi∗≤23\sum x_ix_i^*\le\frac23, Chern-class obstructions ruling out proper infiniteness in every matrix size. Hence a type II1_1 AW∗AW^*-factor that is not a von Neumann algebra exists. Corollary: two unital simple stably finite algebras, one Cr∗(F2)C_r^*(\mathbb F_2), with properly infinite minimal tensor product (answering Milhoj-Rordam Question 2.5), and a separable stably finite algebra with no tracial state. Not shown: a simple or exact example (exact is impossible by Haagerup), or an explicit II1_1 factor.

Theorem 1.1: there are a separable unital C∗C^*-algebra A=M48(B)A=M_{48}(B) with a normalized 2-quasitrace and positive contractions a,ba,b with τ(a+b)−τ(a)−τ(b)≥1/144\tau(a+b)-\tau(a)-\tau(b)\ge1/144 for every normalized 2-quasitrace τ\tau, so none is a trace. BB is generated by 24 shifts between vector bundles with ∑xi∗xi=1\sum x_i^*x_i=1 and ∑xixi∗≤23\sum x_ix_i^*\le\frac23, Chern-class obstructions ruling out proper infiniteness in every matrix size. Hence a type II1_1 AW∗AW^*-factor that is not a von Neumann algebra exists. Corollary: two unital simple stably finite algebras, one Cr∗(F2)C_r^*(\mathbb F_2), with properly infinite minimal tensor product (answering Milhoj-Rordam Question 2.5), and a separable stably finite algebra with no tracial state. Not shown: a simple or exact example (exact is impossible by Haagerup), or an explicit II1_1 factor.

Recorded attempts

Evidence graph

Connected research record

Kaplansky's quasitrace problem: is every 2-quasitrace on a unital C*-algebra a trace? — Mathematical Frontier Network